{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including ciguard.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-44219 exists.","fix":"Upgrade ciguard to 0.8.2 or later.","what":"CVE-2026-44219 is a low-severity denial of service vulnerability in Jo-Jo98 ciguard, published on 12 May 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-44219 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-44219 is a low-severity denial of service vulnerability in Jo-Jo98 ciguard, published on 12 May 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-44219 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- ciguard (PyPI): affected from 0.6.0; fixed in 0.8.2\n- ciguard (PyPI): affected from 0.6.0; fixed in 0.8.2\n- ciguard (PyPI): affected from 0.6.0; fixed in 0.8.2\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-44219/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-44219/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-44219","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-44219/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-44219","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-xw8c-rrvx-f7xq","PYSEC-2026-2410"],"analysis":{"component_type":"developer_tool","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"CI/CD security auditor","requires_auth":"none","summary":"A malicious or compromised upstream service can cause memory exhaustion in ciguard by returning excessively large HTTP responses, leading to denial of service.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"denial_of_service"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":3.7,"severity":"low","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-770","name":"Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"}],"description":"ciguard is a static security auditor for CI/CD pipelines. From 0.6.0 to 0.8.1, both SCA HTTP clients (src/ciguard/analyzer/sca/osv.py and src/ciguard/analyzer/sca/endoflife.py) call payload = json.loads(resp.read().decode('utf-8')) without a maximum-bytes cap. A hostile or compromised endoflife.date / OSV.dev (or a successful TLS MITM) could return a multi-GB response, exhausting the ciguard process's memory. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.2.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"ciguard: SCA HTTP client reads response body without size cap","id":"CVE-2026-44219","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":null,"products":[],"type":"denial_of_service","year":"2026"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":1,"next":{"headline":"ciguard: discover_pipeline_files follows symlinks out of scan root","id":"CVE-2026-44220"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.8.2"],"introduced":["0.6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"ciguard","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-xw8c-rrvx-f7xq"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.8.2"],"introduced":["0.6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"ciguard","purl":"pkg:pypi/ciguard","source":"GHSA-xw8c-rrvx-f7xq"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["0.8.2"],"introduced":["0.6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"ciguard","purl":"pkg:pypi/ciguard","source":"PYSEC-2026-2410"}],"prev":{"headline":"ciguard: Container image runs as root (no USER directive)","id":"CVE-2026-44218"},"products":["ciguard"],"published":"2026-05-12","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-05-13","vendors":["Jo-Jo98"]},"summary":"A malicious or compromised upstream service can cause memory exhaustion in ciguard by returning excessively large HTTP responses, leading to denial of service.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-44219/"}