CVE-2026-53208 Bluetooth: L2CAP: reject BR/EDR signaling packets over MTUsig

Medium 5.5 Published Updated

A remote Bluetooth peer can cause excessive resource consumption and potential denial of service by sending oversized signaling packets containing multiple echo requests.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Any signed-in user
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is CVE-2026-53208?

CVE-2026-53208 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 25 Jun 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: L2CAP: reject BR/EDR signaling packets over MTUsig

net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:l2cap_sig_channel() accepts BR/EDR signaling packets up to the channel MTU and dispatches each command without enforcing the signaling MTU (MTUsig). A Bluetooth BR/EDR peer within radio range can send a fixed-channel CID 0x0001 packet that is larger than MTUsig and contains many L2CAP_ECHO_REQ commands before pairing. In a real-radio stock-kernel run, one 681-byte signaling packet containing 168 zero-length ECHO_REQ commands made the target transmit 168 ECHO_RSP frames over about 220 ms.

Impact: a Bluetooth BR/EDR peer within radio range, before pairing, can force 168 ECHO_RSP frames from one 681-byte fixed-channel signaling packet containing packed ECHO_REQ commands.

Define Linux's BR/EDR signaling MTU as the spec minimum of 48 bytes and reject any larger signaling packet with one L2CAP_COMMAND_REJECT_RSP carrying L2CAP_REJ_MTU_EXCEEDED before any command is dispatched.

The Bluetooth Core spec wording for MTUExceeded says the reject identifier shall match the first request command in the packet, and that packets containing only responses shall be silently discarded. Linux intentionally deviates from that prescription: silently discarding desynchronizes the peer because the remote stack never learns its responses were dropped, and locating the first request command requires walking command headers past MTUsig, i.e. processing bytes from a packet we have already decided is too large to process. We therefore always emit one reject and use the identifier from the first command header, a single fixed-offset byte read.

The unrestricted BR/EDR signaling parser and ECHO_REQ response path both trace to the initial git import; no later introducing commit is available for a Fixes tag.

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-53208?

It affects 1 product.

Products include Linux kernel.

How do I fix CVE-2026-53208?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Upgrade, then put limits on request size, rate and nesting depth so one client cannot exhaust the service. More about Denial of service.

Is CVE-2026-53208 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-53208 in the wild and no public exploit code.

All Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Sources

Also known as AZL-90401, BELL-CVE-2026-53208, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-53208, GHSA-hhxp-r7j7-v7jv, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-11-CVE-2026-53208, ROOT-OS-DEBIAN-12-CVE-2026-53208 and 3 more.

Is CVE-2026-53208 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free