{"answers":{"affected":"6 open source packages ship an affected version, including django. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-53877 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade django to a fixed version for your release line: 5.2.16 or 6.0.7.","what":"CVE-2026-53877 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 7 Jul 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-53877 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-53877 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Djangoproject Django, published on 7 Jul 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-53877 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- django (Bitnami): affected from 5.2.0; fixed in 5.2.16, 6.0.7\n- django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 5.2.16\n- django (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 5.2.16\n- django (PyPI): affected from 5.2; fixed in 5.2.16, 6.0.7\n- django (PyPI): affected from 6.0.0; fixed in 6.0.7\n- django (PyPI): affected from 6.0.0; fixed in 6.0.7\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53877/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53877/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-53877","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53877/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-53877","record":{"aliases":["BIT-django-2026-53877","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-53877","ECHO-540d-90d3-8a54","GHSA-crhf-3pfg-w68w","MINI-8j3x-3rvj-fqj7","MINI-f685-hq49-gf2m","PYSEC-2026-2091","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-53877"],"analysis":{"component_type":"web_application","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Django GIS library","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Heap buffer over-read in Django's GDALRaster allows attackers to disclose adjacent memory or cause denial of service via segmentation faults.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"DSF","cpe":[{"product":"django","vendor":"djangoproject"}],"cvss":{"score":6.3,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-805","name":"Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value"}],"description":"An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.\n`django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` over-reads its in-memory buffer when constructed from a bytes object, which can disclose adjacent memory or cause service degradation via a potential segmentation fault when the `vsi_buffer` property is accessed.\nEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\nDjango would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue.","ecosystems":["Bitnami","PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Heap buffer over-read in GDALRaster","id":"CVE-2026-53877","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","product":"djangoproject:django","products":["djangoproject:django"],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2026"},"n_packages":6,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"Header injection possibility since DomainNameValidator accepted newlines in input","id":"CVE-2026-53878"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","fixed":["5.2.16","6.0.7"],"introduced":["5.2.0","6.0.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:bitnami/django","source":"BIT-django-2026-53877"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["5.2.16"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-crhf-3pfg-w68w"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["5.2.16"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-crhf-3pfg-w68w"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["5.2.16","6.0.7"],"introduced":["5.2","6.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"PYSEC-2026-2091"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["6.0.7"],"introduced":["6.0.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-crhf-3pfg-w68w"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["6.0.7"],"introduced":["6.0.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"django","purl":"pkg:pypi/django","source":"GHSA-crhf-3pfg-w68w"}],"prev":{"headline":"Command injection in RadiX AX6600 WiFi 6 Tri-Band Gaming Router","id":"CVE-2026-53876"},"products":["Django"],"published":"2026-07-07","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin","id":"CVE-2026-4277","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-04-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection in HasKey(lhs, rhs) on Oracle","id":"CVE-2024-53908","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-12-06"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django SQL injection vulnerability","id":"CVE-2024-42005","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2024-08-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django bypasses validation when using one form field to upload multiple files","id":"CVE-2023-31047","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2023-05-07"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Django `Trunc()` and `Extract()` database functions vulnerable to SQL Injection","id":"CVE-2022-34265","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2022-07-04"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL Injection in Django","id":"CVE-2021-35042","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2021-07-02"},{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"SQL injection in Django","id":"CVE-2020-7471","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2020-02-03"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"Apache-2.0","name":"Bitnami","prefix":"BIT"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-07-07","vendors":["djangoproject"]},"summary":"Heap buffer over-read in Django's GDALRaster allows attackers to disclose adjacent memory or cause denial of service via segmentation faults.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53877/"}