{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including github.com/radius-project/radius.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-53999 exists.","fix":"Upgrade github.com/radius-project/radius to 0.58.0 or later.","what":"CVE-2026-53999 is a high-severity vulnerability in radius-project radius, published on 14 Oct 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-53999 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-53999 is a high-severity vulnerability in radius-project radius, published on 14 Oct 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-53999 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- github.com/radius-project/radius (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 0.58.0\n- github.com/radius-project/radius (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 0.58.0\n- github.com/radius-project/radius (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 0.58.0\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53999/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53999/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-53999","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53999/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-53999","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-fp5j-4fj2-4jvq","GO-2026-5373"],"analysis":{"component_type":"cloud_service","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"Radius application platform","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"An attacker can delete another tenant's container resources by forging deployment annotations in multi-tenant Radius installations, causing service disruption.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"business_logic"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":7.7,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-441","name":"Unintended Proxy or Intermediary"},{"id":"CWE-20","name":"Improper Input Validation"}],"description":"Radius is a cloud-native, portable application platform that makes app development easier for teams building cloud-native apps. Prior to 0.58.0, the Kubernetes controller deserializes the user-controlled radapp.io/status annotation on a Deployment and uses its container resource identifier for deletion without confirming ownership by that Deployment. An attacker with permission to modify Deployment annotations and knowledge of a target Radius resource ID can forge radapp.io/status and set radapp.io/enabled to false, causing reconciliation to enter the privileged deletion path for another tenant's Radius-managed container resource. In a multi-tenant installation this confused-deputy condition can delete another team's recoverable container resource and disrupt service; in a single-tenant installation the impact is limited to self denial of service. The multi-tenant Radius controller reads the annotations in pkg/controller/reconciler/annotations.go and reaches the privileged delete in pkg/controller/reconciler/deployment_reconciler.go. The issue does not disclose data, grant privileges, or provide persistence. This issue is fixed in version 0.58.0.","ecosystems":["Go"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Radius Controller May Delete a Container Resource via an Injected Deployment Annotation (Multi-Tenant Installs)","id":"CVE-2026-53999","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Go","product":null,"products":[],"type":"business_logic","year":"2026"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"osquery: Heap buffer overflow in `getProcessCurrentDirectory()` via `processes` table (Windows)","id":"CVE-2026-54000"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["0.58.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/radius-project/radius","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-fp5j-4fj2-4jvq"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["0.58.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/radius-project/radius","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/radius-project/radius","source":"GHSA-fp5j-4fj2-4jvq"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["0.58.0"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"github.com/radius-project/radius","purl":"pkg:golang/github.com/radius-project/radius","source":"GO-2026-5373"}],"prev":{"headline":"Netherman Portal del Hermano Account Takeover via Password Reset Oracle","id":"CVE-2026-53997"},"products":["radius"],"published":"2026-10-14","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"Go Vulnerability Database","prefix":"GO"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-10-14","vendors":["radius-project"]},"summary":"An attacker can delete another tenant's container resources by forging deployment annotations in multi-tenant Radius installations, causing service disruption.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53999/"}