{"answers":{"affected":"It affects 1 product.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-57217 exists.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2026-57217 is a high-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 10 Jul 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-57217 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-57217 is a high-severity authentication bypass vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 10 Jul 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-57217 exists.\n\nAffected product: Broadcom Rabbitmq Server. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-57217/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-57217/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-57217","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-57217/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-57217","record":{"aliases":["AZL-92340","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-57217","GHSA-gpvw-75h5-3wvx","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-57217"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass","data_modify"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"RabbitMQ message broker","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"Attackers can bypass topic authorization and perform restricted writes or binds during metadata-store failures in RabbitMQ.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"auth_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"rabbitmq_server","vendor":"broadcom"}],"cvss":{"score":7,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-863","name":"Incorrect Authorization"}],"description":"RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.21, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, RabbitMQ topic authorization can allow restricted topic writes and binds during metadata-store failures because topic-permission lookup errors from Khepri can collapse to undefined, which the internal backend treats as allow. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.21, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"RabbitMQ: Topic authorization can lead to cross-tenant routing-key bypass","id":"CVE-2026-57217","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":"broadcom:rabbitmq_server","products":["broadcom:rabbitmq_server"],"type":"auth_bypass","year":"2026"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":6,"next":{"headline":"RabbitMQ: AMQP 0-9-1 in combination with OAuth 2: consumer persistence can lead to post-revocation message disclosure","id":"CVE-2026-57218"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Auth bypass in rabbitmq-server","id":"CVE-2026-57216"},"products":["rabbitmq-server"],"published":"2026-07-10","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6; RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.5.20, 1.6.x before 1.6.12 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7","id":"CVE-2016-9877","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-12-29"},{"cvss_score":9.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: OAuth2 silent verify_none fallback for JWKS fetch","id":"CVE-2026-67404","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-23"},{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"RabbitMQ: Trust-store whitelist by Issuer+Serial only","id":"CVE-2026-67231","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-23"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"Information disclosure in rabbitmq-server","id":"CVE-2026-57219","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-07-10"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: Plaintext username:password stored in an insecure cookie after successful POST /login","id":"CVE-2026-67236","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: JWKS Fetch Ignores HTTP Response Status Code - Signing Key Destruction Causes Authentication DoS","id":"CVE-2026-67409","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: OAuth2 Client Secret Exposed via Unauthenticated JavaScript Endpoint","id":"CVE-2026-67410","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-07-13","vendors":["rabbitmq"]},"summary":"Attackers can bypass topic authorization and perform restricted writes or binds during metadata-store failures in RabbitMQ.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-57217/"}