# CVE-2026-64012: net/sched: sch_sfb: Replace direct dequeue call with peek and qdisc_dequeue_peeked

> A null pointer dereference in the Linux kernel's SFB scheduler can cause a kernel panic when specific qdisc hierarchies are used.

- **Severity:** Medium 5.5 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 19 Jul 2026
- **Updated:** 19 Jul 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2026-64012, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-64012, GHSA-r9v4-xqjf-v9m3, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2026-64012, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64012

## What is CVE-2026-64012?

CVE-2026-64012 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 19 Jul 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: sch_sfb: Replace direct dequeue call with peek and qdisc_dequeue_peeked

When sfb has children (eg qfq qdisc) whose peek() callback is
qdisc_peek_dequeued(), we could get a kernel panic. When the parent of such
qdiscs (eg illustrated in patch #3 as tbf) wants to retrieve an skb from
its child (sfb in this case), it will do the following:
 1a. do a peek() - and when sensing there's an skb the child can offer, then
     - the child in this case(sfb) calls its child's (qfq) peek.
        qfq does the right thing and will return the gso_skb queue packet.
        Note: if there wasnt a gso_skb entry then qfq will store it there.
 1b. invoke a dequeue() on the child (sfb). And herein lies the problem.
     - sfb will call the child's dequeue() which will essentially just
       try to grab something of qfq's queue.

[  127.594489][  T453] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000048-0x000000000000004f]
[  127.594741][  T453] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 453 Comm: ping Not tainted 7.1.0-rc1-00035-gac961974495b-dirty #793 PREEMPT(full)
[  127.595059][  T453] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[  127.595254][  T453] RIP: 0010:qfq_dequeue+0x35c/0x1650 [sch_qfq]
[  127.595461][  T453] Code: 00 fc ff df 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 17 0e 00 00 4c 8d 73 48 48 89 9d b8 02 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 f2 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 76 0c 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b
[  127.596081][  T453] RSP: 0018:ffff88810e5af440 EFLAGS: 00010216
[  127.596337][  T453] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: dffffc0000000000
[  127.596623][  T453] RDX: 0000000000000009 RSI: 0000001880000000 RDI: ffff888104fd82b0
[  127.596917][  T453] RBP: ffff888104fd8000 R08: ffff888104fd8280 R09: 1ffff110211893a3
[  127.597165][  T453] R10: 1ffff110211893a6 R11: 1ffff110211893a7 R12: 0000001880000000
[  127.597404][  T453] R13: ffff888104fd82b8 R14: 0000000000000048 R15: 0000000040000000
[  127.597644][  T453] FS:  00007fc380cbfc40(0000) GS:ffff88816f2a8000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  127.597956][  T453] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  127.598160][  T453] CR2: 00005610aa9890a8 CR3: 000000010369e000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
[  127.598390][  T453] PKRU: 55555554
[  127.598509][  T453] Call Trace:
[  127.598629][  T453]  <TASK>
[  127.598718][  T453]  ? mark_held_locks+0x40/0x70
[  127.598890][  T453]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  127.599053][  T453]  sfb_dequeue+0x88/0x4d0
[  127.599174][  T453]  ? ktime_get+0x137/0x230
[  127.599328][  T453]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  127.599480][  T453]  ? qdisc_peek_dequeued+0x7b/0x350 [sch_qfq]
[  127.599670][  T453]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  127.599831][  T453]  tbf_dequeue+0x6b1/0x1098 [sch_tbf]
[  127.599988][  T453]  __qdisc_run+0x169/0x1900

The right thing to do in #1b is to grab the skb off gso_skb queue.
This patchset fixes that issue by changing #1b to use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()
method instead.

Weakness: CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-64012?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2026-64012?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-64012 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-64012 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-64012 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-64012 is a medium-severity vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 19 Jul 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-64012 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-64012/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-64012/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64012
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64012
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-64012

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-64012/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
