# CVE-2026-64265: fuse: clear intr_entry in fuse_resend and fuse_remove_pending_req

> A use-after-free in the Linux kernel FUSE subsystem allows attackers to execute code or leak data via dangling interrupt entries.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 25 Jul 2026
- **Updated:** 17 Aug 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2026-64265, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-64265, GHSA-694x-mwh7-5pvf, ROOT-OS-UBUNTU-2204-CVE-2026-64265, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64265

## What is CVE-2026-64265?

CVE-2026-64265 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 25 Jul 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fuse: clear intr_entry in fuse_resend and fuse_remove_pending_req

When fuse_resend() moves a request from fpq->processing back to
fiq->pending, it sets FR_PENDING and clears FR_SENT but does not
remove the requests intr_entry from fiq->interrupts.  If the
request had FR_INTERRUPTED set from a prior signal, intr_entry
remains dangling on fiq->interrupts.  When the requesting task
then receives a fatal signal, fuse_remove_pending_req() sees
FR_PENDING=1, removes the request from fiq->pending and frees it
via the refcount path, also without cleaning intr_entry.  The
stale intr_entry causes use-after-free when fuse_read_interrupt()
iterates fiq->interrupts:
  - list_del_init(&req->intr_entry) -> UAF write on freed slab
  - req->in.h.unique -> UAF read, data leaked to userspace

Remove intr_entry from fiq->interrupts in fuse_resend() for
interrupted requests before they are placed back on fiq->pending.

Add a WARN_ON if the intr_entry is not empty on request destruction.

Weakness: CWE-416 (Use After Free)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-64265?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2026-64265?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-64265 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-64265 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-64265 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-64265 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 25 Jul 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-64265 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-64265/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-64265/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64265
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64265
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-64265

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-64265/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
