# CVE-2026-66075: RabbitMQ: Monitoring-tag user can restart federation links

> A monitoring user can restart federation links, disrupting message flow, due to missing authorization checks in RabbitMQ.

- **Severity:** Low 2.3 (`CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 23 Sep 2026
- **Updated:** 24 Sep 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-105753, BIT-rabbitmq-2026-66075, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-66075, GHSA-g5v3-w5xg-62q2, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-66075

## What is CVE-2026-66075?

CVE-2026-66075 is a low-severity missing authorization vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 23 Sep 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.1, is_authorized/2 for the /federation-links/.../restart route uses is_authorized_monitor (accepts the monitoring tag), while allowed_methods permits DELETE and delete_resource/2 triggers rabbit_federation_link_sup:restart. There is no per-method elevation check and no comment marking it intentional. A read-only monitoring user can restart any federation link , a state-changing operation that disrupts message flow. Preconditions include rabbitmq_federation + rabbitmq_federation_management plugins enabled Attacker has credentials with the monitoring tag. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.1.

Weakness: CWE-862 (Missing Authorization)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-66075?

1 open source package ship an affected version, including rabbitmq. It affects 1 product.


| Package | Ecosystem | Affected | Fixed in |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `rabbitmq` | Bitnami | From 3.13.0 | 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.1 |

Products: Broadcom Rabbitmq Server.

## How do I fix CVE-2026-66075?

Upgrade rabbitmq to a fixed version for your release line: 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11 or 4.2.6.

## Is CVE-2026-66075 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-66075 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server

- [CVE-2016-9877](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2016-9877/): Auth bypass in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6; RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.5.20, 1.6.x before 1.6.12 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7 (critical 9.8)
- [CVE-2026-67404](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67404/): RabbitMQ: OAuth2 silent verify_none fallback for JWKS fetch (critical 9.2)
- [CVE-2026-67231](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67231/): RabbitMQ: Trust-store whitelist by Issuer+Serial only (critical 9.1)
- [CVE-2026-57219](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-57219/): Information disclosure in rabbitmq-server (high 8.7)
- [CVE-2026-67236](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67236/): RabbitMQ: Plaintext username:password stored in an insecure cookie after successful POST /login (high 8.2)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-66075 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-66075 is a low-severity missing authorization vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 23 Sep 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-66075 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected packages and fixed versions:
- rabbitmq (Bitnami): affected from 3.13.0; fixed in 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.1

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-66075/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-66075/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66075
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-66075
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-66075

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-66075/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.