{"answers":{"affected":"1 open source package ship an affected version, including rabbitmq. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-67220 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade rabbitmq to a fixed version for your release line: 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11 or 4.2.6.","what":"CVE-2026-67220 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 23 Sep 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-67220 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-67220 is a medium-severity denial of service vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 23 Sep 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-67220 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- rabbitmq (Bitnami): affected from 3.13.0; fixed in 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67220/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67220/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-67220","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67220/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-67220","record":{"aliases":["AZL-109725","BIT-rabbitmq-2026-67220","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-67220","GHSA-r3qr-4h63-mvj2","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-67220"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"RabbitMQ message broker","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"An authenticated user can crash the RabbitMQ broker by sending crafted JMS topic bindings that exhaust atom memory, requiring the JMS plugin to be enabled.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"denial_of_service"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"rabbitmq_server","vendor":"broadcom"}],"cvss":{"score":6,"severity":"medium","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-400","name":"Uncontrolled Resource Consumption"}],"description":"RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.0, When a binding is created on an x-jms-topic exchange, add_binding/3 reads the rjms_erlang_selector argument and passes it through erl_scan:string/1 then erl_parse:parse_term/1. erl_scan:string/1 interns every atom literal it tokenizes. validate_binding/2 is a no-op (-\u003e ok.), there is no length cap, and the surrounding try/catch cannot reclaim atoms. The Java JMS client compiles selectors client-side, but the server does not enforce this , a raw AMQP client can send arbitrary selector strings. An authenticated low-privilege AMQP user confined to one vhost can crash the entire broker node (cross-tenant DoS) in \u003c100 bind calls. Preconditions include rabbitmq_jms_topic_exchange plugin enabled (bundled; required for any JMS deployment) Authenticated AMQP user with read on an x-jms-topic exchange + write on a queue (or configure to declare both). This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.0.","ecosystems":["Bitnami"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"RabbitMQ: JMS topic exchange erl_scan atom exhaustion","id":"CVE-2026-67220","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","product":"broadcom:rabbitmq_server","products":["broadcom:rabbitmq_server"],"type":"denial_of_service","year":"2026"},"n_packages":1,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"RabbitMQ: AMQP 1.0 shovel status exposes plaintext URI passwords","id":"CVE-2026-67221"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","fixed":["3.13.15","4.0.20","4.1.11","4.2.6"],"introduced":["3.13.0","4.0.0","4.1.0","4.2.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"rabbitmq","purl":"pkg:bitnami/rabbitmq","source":"BIT-rabbitmq-2026-67220"}],"prev":{"headline":"RabbitMQ: Consistent-hash exchange unbounded weight","id":"CVE-2026-67219"},"products":["rabbitmq-server"],"published":"2026-09-23","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6; RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.5.20, 1.6.x before 1.6.12 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7","id":"CVE-2016-9877","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-12-29"},{"cvss_score":9.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: OAuth2 silent verify_none fallback for JWKS fetch","id":"CVE-2026-67404","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-23"},{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"RabbitMQ: Trust-store whitelist by Issuer+Serial only","id":"CVE-2026-67231","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-23"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"Information disclosure in rabbitmq-server","id":"CVE-2026-57219","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-07-10"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: Plaintext username:password stored in an insecure cookie after successful POST /login","id":"CVE-2026-67236","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: JWKS Fetch Ignores HTTP Response Status Code - Signing Key Destruction Causes Authentication DoS","id":"CVE-2026-67409","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: OAuth2 Client Secret Exposed via Unauthenticated JavaScript Endpoint","id":"CVE-2026-67410","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"Apache-2.0","name":"Bitnami","prefix":"BIT"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-09-24","vendors":["rabbitmq"]},"summary":"An authenticated user can crash the RabbitMQ broker by sending crafted JMS topic bindings that exhaust atom memory, requiring the JMS plugin to be enabled.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67220/"}