{"answers":{"affected":"1 open source package ship an affected version, including rabbitmq. It affects 1 product.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-67235 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade rabbitmq to a fixed version for your release line: 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11 or 4.2.6.","what":"CVE-2026-67235 is a high-severity denial of service vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 23 Sep 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-67235 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-67235 is a high-severity denial of service vulnerability in Broadcom Rabbitmq Server, published on 23 Sep 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-67235 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- rabbitmq (Bitnami): affected from 3.13.0; fixed in 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67235/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67235/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-67235","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67235/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-67235","record":{"aliases":["AZL-105798","BIT-rabbitmq-2026-67235","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-67235","GHSA-q8g2-pc7m-m3jw","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-67235"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["denial_of_service"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"RabbitMQ message broker","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"An authenticated AMQP client can cause memory exhaustion and cluster-wide denial of service by streaming unbounded message fragments.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"denial_of_service"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[{"product":"rabbitmq_server","vendor":"broadcom"}],"cvss":{"score":7.1,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-770","name":"Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"}],"description":"RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15, The content-header BodySize (a uint64) was stored without validation against max_message_size. The size check ran only when assembly completed. By declaring body_size = 2^63-1 and then streaming fragments, a client ensured that check_msg_size never fired, so the accumulated body size went unbounded. A reader process accumulates memory until the memory alarm fires, degrading all publishers cluster-wide, or until the node runs out of memory. The memory alarm provides only partial mitigation, since it is reactive rather than preventive. AMQP 0-9-1 is the most widely used protocol, and any publisher can trigger this condition. Preconditions include Any authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 client with publish permission can exploit this.. This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.0, 4.2.6, 4.1.11, 4.0.20, and 3.13.15.","ecosystems":["Bitnami"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"RabbitMQ: AMQP 0-9-1 body assembly never validates accumulated size","id":"CVE-2026-67235","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","product":"broadcom:rabbitmq_server","products":["broadcom:rabbitmq_server"],"type":"denial_of_service","year":"2026"},"n_packages":1,"n_references":3,"next":{"headline":"RabbitMQ: Plaintext username:password stored in an insecure cookie after successful POST /login","id":"CVE-2026-67236"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","fixed":["3.13.15","4.0.20","4.1.11","4.2.6"],"introduced":["3.13.0","4.0.0","4.1.0","4.2.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"rabbitmq","purl":"pkg:bitnami/rabbitmq","source":"BIT-rabbitmq-2026-67235"}],"prev":{"headline":"RabbitMQ: Non-RFC-conformant cookie name when clearing the auth-mechanism preference","id":"CVE-2026-67234"},"products":["rabbitmq-server"],"published":"2026-09-23","related":[{"cvss_score":9.8,"headline":"Auth bypass in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6; RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.5.20, 1.6.x before 1.6.12 and 1.7.x before 1.7.7","id":"CVE-2016-9877","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2016-12-29"},{"cvss_score":9.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: OAuth2 silent verify_none fallback for JWKS fetch","id":"CVE-2026-67404","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-23"},{"cvss_score":9.1,"headline":"RabbitMQ: Trust-store whitelist by Issuer+Serial only","id":"CVE-2026-67231","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-23"},{"cvss_score":8.7,"headline":"Information disclosure in rabbitmq-server","id":"CVE-2026-57219","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-07-10"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: Plaintext username:password stored in an insecure cookie after successful POST /login","id":"CVE-2026-67236","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: JWKS Fetch Ignores HTTP Response Status Code - Signing Key Destruction Causes Authentication DoS","id":"CVE-2026-67409","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"},{"cvss_score":8.2,"headline":"RabbitMQ: OAuth2 Client Secret Exposed via Unauthenticated JavaScript Endpoint","id":"CVE-2026-67410","kev_date_added":null,"published":"2026-09-25"}],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"Apache-2.0","name":"Bitnami","prefix":"BIT"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"US public information, NVD API terms","name":"NVD"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-09-24","vendors":["rabbitmq"]},"summary":"An authenticated AMQP client can cause memory exhaustion and cluster-wide denial of service by streaming unbounded message fragments.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-67235/"}