# CVE-2026-68420: xfrm: reject optional IPTFS templates in outbound policies

> A stack-out-of-bounds read in the Linux kernel's xfrm subsystem allows local attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted outbound policies.

- **Severity:** High 7.1 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 10 Aug 2026
- **Updated:** 17 Aug 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2026-68420, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-68420, GHSA-hf2r-xm53-x39m, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-68420

## What is CVE-2026-68420?

CVE-2026-68420 is a high-severity memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 10 Aug 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: reject optional IPTFS templates in outbound policies

syzbot reported a stack-out-of-bounds read in xfrm_state_find()
which flows from xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one().

Commit 3d776e31c841 ("xfrm: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode
templates in outbound policies") disallowed optional tunnel and
BEET in outbound policies to prevent this. Later when IPTFS
added, it was not covered by that fix and can still trigger
the out-of-bounds read;

Extend the check to disallow optional IPTFS in outbound policies
as well. IPTFS should be identical to tunnel mode.
IN and FWD policies are not affected: xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one()
is only reachable via the outbound path.

Reproducer, before:

ip link add dummy0 type dummy
ip link set dummy0 up
ip addr add 10.1.1.1/24 dev dummy0
ip xfrm policy add src 10.1.1.1/32 dst 10.1.1.2/32 dir out tmpl
  src fc00::dead:1 dst fc00::dead:2 proto esp reqid 1 mode iptfs
  level use tmpl src fc00::dead:1 dst fc00::dead:2 proto esp reqid
  2 mode transport
ping -W 1 -c 1 10.1.1.2
PING 10.1.1.2 (10.1.1.2) 56(84) bytes of data.

[   64.168420] ==================================================================
[   64.169977] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170
[   64.169977] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800e1ffd20 by task ping/2844

[   64.169977] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 2844 Comm: ping Not tainted 7.1.0-rc7-00180-geb23b588430a #98 PREEMPT(full)
[   64.169977] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[   64.169977] Call Trace:
[   64.169977]  <TASK>
[   64.169977]  dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70
[   64.169977]  ? __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170
[   64.169977]  print_report+0x152/0x4b0
[   64.169977]  ? ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x6d/0xa0
[   64.169977]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[   64.169977]  ? rcu_read_unlock_sched+0xa/0x20
[   64.169977]  ? __virt_addr_valid+0x21b/0x230
[   64.169977]  ? __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170
[   64.169977]  kasan_report+0xa8/0xd0
[   64.169977]  ? __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170
[   64.169977]  __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170
[   64.169977]  __xfrm_dst_hash+0x24/0xc0
[   64.169977]  xfrm_state_find+0xa2d/0x2f90
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_state_find+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_ftrace_graph_ret_addr+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_ftrace_graph_ret_addr+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one+0x210/0x570
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_stack_trace_consume_entry+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? kernel_text_address+0x5b/0x80
[   64.169977]  ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30
[   64.169977]  ? unwind_get_return_address+0x5e/0x90
[   64.169977]  ? arch_stack_walk+0x8c/0xe0
[   64.169977]  xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0x130/0x200
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_policy_inexact_lookup_rcu+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? __refcount_add_not_zero.constprop.0+0xb2/0x110
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx___refcount_add_not_zero.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0xd5/0x310
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x3d8/0xb80
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? ip_route_output_key_hash+0xc6/0x110
[   64.169977]  ? kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
[   64.169977]  xfrm_lookup_route+0x18/0xe0
[   64.169977]  ip4_datagram_release_cb+0x4c9/0x530
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_ip4_datagram_release_cb+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x71/0xc0
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  release_sock+0xb0/0x170
[   64.169977]  udp_connect+0x43/0x50
[   64.169977]  __sys_connect+0xa6/0x100
[   64.169977]  ? alloc_fd+0x2e9/0x300
[   64.169977]  ? __pfx___sys_connect+0x10/0x10
[   64.169977]  ? preempt_latency
---truncated---

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-68420?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-68420?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-68420 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-68420 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-68420 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-68420 is a high-severity memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 10 Aug 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-68420 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-68420/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-68420/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68420
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68420
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-68420

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-68420/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
