{"answers":{"affected":"3 open source packages ship an affected version, including mobsf.","exploited":"It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-68927 exists.","fix":"Upgrade mobsf to 4.5.1 or later.","what":"CVE-2026-68927 is a low-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF, published on 18 Aug 2026. An attacker needs administrator access to exploit it, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-68927 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-68927 is a low-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF, published on 18 Aug 2026. An attacker needs administrator access to exploit it, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: It is not confirmed as exploited in the wild, but public exploit code for CVE-2026-68927 exists.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- mobsf (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 4.5.1\n- mobsf (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 4.5.1\n- mobsf (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 4.5.1\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-68927/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-68927/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-68927","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-68927/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-68927","record":{"aliases":["GHSA-95px-34x5-p37h","PYSEC-2026-3690"],"analysis":{"component_type":"developer_tool","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["data_read","security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"MobSF security testing tool","requires_auth":"high_privilege","summary":"An authenticated user can bypass port restrictions in MobSF to perform Server-Side Request Forgery against internal services via crafted APKs.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"ssrf"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"GitHub_M","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":3,"severity":"low","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-918","name":"Server-Side Request Forgery"}],"description":"MobSF is a mobile application security testing tool used. Prior to 4.5.1, get_browsable_activities in mobsf/StaticAnalyzer/views/android/manifest_analysis.py validates only an Android manifest android:host value with valid_host before appending a separately supplied android:port to the URL fetched by _check_url, allowing an authenticated user to upload a crafted APK that makes requests to an attacker-selected nonstandard port at /.well-known/assetlinks.json. With an attacker-controlled hostname and DNS rebinding between validation and the requests.get connection, the request can reach an internal service, although redirects remain disabled and the path is fixed. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.1.","ecosystems":["PyPI"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"weaponised"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"MobSF: SSRF port restriction bypass in assetlinks_check","id":"CVE-2026-68927","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":"PyPI","product":null,"products":[],"type":"ssrf","year":"2026"},"n_packages":3,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Command injection in Acode","id":"CVE-2026-68928"},"packages":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["4.5.1"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"mobsf","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-95px-34x5-p37h"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["4.5.1"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"mobsf","purl":"pkg:pypi/mobsf","source":"GHSA-95px-34x5-p37h"},{"ecosystem":"PyPI","fixed":["4.5.1"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"mobsf","purl":"pkg:pypi/mobsf","source":"PYSEC-2026-3690"}],"prev":{"headline":"MobSF: Zip Bomb Denial of Service via Per-File Size Limit Bypass in ZIP/APK Extraction","id":"CVE-2026-68924"},"products":["Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF"],"published":"2026-08-18","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"PyPA Advisory Database","prefix":"PYSEC"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"poc","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-08-18","vendors":["MobSF"]},"summary":"An authenticated user can bypass port restrictions in MobSF to perform Server-Side Request Forgery against internal services via crafted APKs.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-68927/"}