{"answers":{"affected":"","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-73812 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade to a fixed version.","what":"CVE-2026-73812 is a high-severity vulnerability in Erlang OTP, published on 1 Sep 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-73812 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-73812 is a high-severity vulnerability in Erlang OTP, published on 1 Sep 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-73812 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Erlang OTP. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-73812/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-73812/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-73812","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-73812/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-73812","record":{"aliases":["AZL-98490","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-73812","EEF-CVE-2026-73812","GHSA-7j6m-4ffg-hg46","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-73812"],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["security_bypass"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Erlang OTP inets","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Attackers can exploit HTTP request smuggling in Erlang OTP inets by sending conflicting Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers, bypassing front-end security controls.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"other"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"EEF","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":8.3,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"cwes":[{"id":"CWE-444","name":"Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests"}],"description":"httpd function check_header/3 rejects duplicate Content-Length (per CVE-2026-23941) but never checks for the TE+CL co-presence that RFC 9112 §6.3 identifies as a probable smuggling attempt. handle_body/3 frames by chunked and silently discards Content-Length. A CL-preferring front-end paired with chunked-preferring inets creates a classic CL.TE front-end/back-end desync.\n\nThis issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"inets, httpd: HTTP Request Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length","id":"CVE-2026-73812","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"other","year":"2026"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":4,"next":{"headline":"Gitea repository ownership escalation by administrators","id":"CVE-2026-73814"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"Ebyte NA111-M Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information","id":"CVE-2026-73809"},"products":["OTP"],"published":"2026-09-01","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CWE Terms of Use","name":"CWE (MITRE)"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":"no","exploitation":"none","technical_impact":"partial"},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-09-08","vendors":["Erlang"]},"summary":"Attackers can exploit HTTP request smuggling in Erlang OTP inets by sending conflicting Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers, bypassing front-end security controls.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-73812/"}