CVE-2026-80827 USB: serial: option: fix slab OOB read in interrupt URB callback

Not scored Published Updated

A malicious USB device can trigger a slab out-of-bounds read in the Linux kernel's option driver, potentially leaking memory or causing a crash.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Not needed
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
A user has to click or open something
Fix
Available

What is CVE-2026-80827?

CVE-2026-80827 is a memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 4 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

USB: serial: option: fix slab OOB read in interrupt URB callback

The interrupt URB buffer is allocated in setup_port_interrupt_in() based on the endpoint's wMaxPacketSize:

buffer_size = usb_endpoint_maxp(epd); port->interrupt_in_buffer = kmalloc(buffer_size, GFP_KERNEL);

When a USB device declares wMaxPacketSize = 8 on its interrupt IN endpoint, the buffer is allocated from kmalloc-8 cache (exactly 8 bytes).

If the device sends a short packet (actual_length < wMaxPacketSize), the URB completes with status == 0 and the callback proceeds to read:

data[sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest)]

which evaluates to data[8], accessing 1 byte beyond the allocated 8-byte buffer. This results in a slab out-of-bounds read.

Fix this by adding the missing bounds check: first verify that the actual length is large enough to contain the struct usb_ctrlrequest header before accessing req_pkt->bRequestType and req_pkt->bRequest, and then verify that there is an additional byte for the modem signal state before reading data[sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest)] inside the conditional. Use sizeof(*req_pkt) instead of sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest) for consistency.

[ johan: use dev_err(); split signals declaration and initialisation ]

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-80827?

How do I fix CVE-2026-80827?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Upgrade to the fixed version. Memory-safe languages, compiler hardening and fuzzing prevent most new cases. More about Memory corruption.

Is CVE-2026-80827 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-80827 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Also known as AZL-99644, BELL-CVE-2026-80827, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-80827, GHSA-459p-cph9-qpfg, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-80827.

Is CVE-2026-80827 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free