{"answers":{"affected":"","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-89760 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Apply the vendor's patch.","what":"CVE-2026-89760 is a high-severity memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 11 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-89760 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-89760 is a high-severity memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 11 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-89760 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-89760/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-89760/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-89760","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-89760/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-89760","record":{"aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2026-89760","GHSA-jf6f-8m48-j65r","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-89760"],"analysis":{"component_type":"kernel","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["denial_of_service","data_modify"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Linux kernel","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"A Linux kernel swap management bug allows silent memory corruption and crashes when hibernation slots are freed while cached, impacting system stability.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"memory_corruption"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"Linux","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":7.8,"severity":"high","source":"cna","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"cwes":[],"description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm, swap: don't free a hibernation slot that is in the swap cache\n\nA slot with a folio in the swap cache is freed when the folio leaves the\ncache, not when its count drops.  swap_put_entries_cluster() follows that\nrule.  swap_free_hibernation_slot() does not, it calls\n__swap_cluster_free_entries() whether or not a folio sits on the slot.\n\nCluster readahead can put one there.  It walks a raw page_cluster sized\nwindow of offsets around the faulting entry, and a hibernation slot passes\n__swap_cache_add_check() because it is not a folio and its count is not\nzero.  Freeing the slot then clears the entry under that folio.\n\nThe folio is now unreachable from the swap table, and the offset goes back\nto the allocator.  The folio is still on the LRU though, so reclaim can\npick it up later.  It then takes the old offset out of folio-\u003eswap and\noverwrites the table entry there, which by then may belong to someone\nelse.\n\nThis bug can trigger silent memory corruption, process crashes, or data\ninstability across completely unrelated userspace applications - typically\noccurring when uswsusp is preparing the hibernation image.\n\nI found this while working on giving hibernation slots their own marker in\nthe swap table, which I had discussed with Kairui. \n(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/abp7aDgYLrxF3Me8@KASONG-MC4/) As far as\nI know there are no reports, so there is no Reported-by/Closes to add.\n\nCheck for a cached folio before freeing.  The slot is then left in the\nordinary state where only the swap cache holds it, and it is freed when\nthe folio leaves the cache, either through the reclaim below or through\nnormal reclaim later.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"mm, swap: don't free a hibernation slot that is in the swap cache","id":"CVE-2026-89760","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"memory_corruption","year":"2026"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":2,"next":{"headline":"apparmor: fix out-of-bounds write when null terminating a label vec","id":"CVE-2026-89761"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks","id":"CVE-2026-89759"},"products":["Linux"],"published":"2026-09-11","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"FIRST CVSS licence","name":"CVSS (FIRST)"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-10-19","vendors":["Linux"]},"summary":"A Linux kernel swap management bug allows silent memory corruption and crashes when hibernation slots are freed while cached, impacting system stability.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-89760/"}