CVE-2026-90049 net: skbuff: don't skb_tx_error() the source skb in skb_zerocopy()

Critical 9.3 Published Updated

A flaw in Linux kernel skb_zerocopy allows memory corruption via ESP decryption on shared fragments, potentially enabling privilege escalation or code execution.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Not needed
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is CVE-2026-90049?

CVE-2026-90049 is a critical memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 16 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: skbuff: don't skb_tx_error() the source skb in skb_zerocopy()

skb_zerocopy() copies frags from @from into @to. On an skb_orphan_frags() failure it calls skb_tx_error(@from), a destructive operation on the source skb the copy helper does not own. That completes @from's zerocopy uarg and clears SKBFL_ALL_ZEROCOPY, including the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG page-ownership marker.

Both callers already report the failure on their own drop path. nfnetlink_queue does it at nla_put_failure, and Open vSwitch does it in the flow-miss drop arm of ovs_dp_process_packet(), so nothing is lost by dropping it here.

On Open vSwitch's OVS_ACTION_ATTR_USERSPACE path the skb is not freed on this error: do_execute_actions() ignores output_userspace()'s return value and, unless the upcall was the last action, keeps forwarding the same skb through the flow's remaining actions. The uarg is completed while that skb is still in flight, telling the producer its buffers are free, and SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG is cleared on an skb the rest of the stack still handles. That flag is what makes esp_input() call skb_cow_data() instead of decrypting in place, so a later local ESP delivery can decrypt over frags the skb does not own privately.

Leave error reporting to the callers.

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-90049?

How do I fix CVE-2026-90049?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Upgrade to the fixed version. Memory-safe languages, compiler hardening and fuzzing prevent most new cases. More about Memory corruption.

Is CVE-2026-90049 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-90049 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Also known as AZL-101409, BELL-CVE-2026-90049, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-90049, GHSA-px64-7mq2-m5mm, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-90049.

Is CVE-2026-90049 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free