CVE-2026-92483 liveupdate: Remember FLB retrieve() status

Not scored Published Updated

A local attacker can trigger a use-after-free in the Linux kernel liveupdate module by retrying a failed file retrieval, potentially leading to code execution or privilege escalation.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Any signed-in user
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is CVE-2026-92483?

CVE-2026-92483 is an use after free vulnerability in Linux, published on 17 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

liveupdate: Remember FLB retrieve() status

LUO keeps track of successful retrieve attempts on an FLB. It does so to avoid multiple retrievals of the same FLB. Multiple retrievals cause problems because once the FLB is retrieved, the serialized data structures are likely freed and the FLB is likely in a very different state from what the code expects.

All this works well when retrieve succeeds. When it fails, luo_flb_retrieve_one() returns the error immediately, without ever storing anywhere that a retrieve was attempted or what its error code was. If the user attempts to retrieve another file registered with the same FLB, LUO will attempt to call the FLB's retrieve() callback again.

The retry is problematic for much of the same reasons listed above. The FLB is likely in a very different state than what the retrieve logic normally expects (e.g. some KHO pages may have already been restored and freed).

There is no sane way of attempting the retrieve again. Remember the error retrieve returned and directly return it on a retry.

This is done by changing the retrieved bool to a retrieve_status integer. A value of 0 means retrieve was never attempted, a positive value means it succeeded, and a negative value means it failed and the error code is the value.

This is similar to commit f85b1c6af5bc ("liveupdate: luo_file: remember retrieve() status") which did the same for LUO files.

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-92483?

How do I fix CVE-2026-92483?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Upgrade to the fixed version. These bugs are found with fuzzing and sanitisers and avoided by memory-safe languages. More about Use after free.

Is CVE-2026-92483 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-92483 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Also known as DEBIAN-CVE-2026-92483, GHSA-ppch-xf6h-8vx5, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-92483.

Is CVE-2026-92483 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free