# CVE-2026-92499: ext4: validate readdir offset before accessing dirent

> A local attacker can trigger a use-after-free in the Linux kernel ext4 filesystem by mounting a corrupted directory image, potentially causing a system crash or code execution.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 17 Sep 2026
- **Updated:** 19 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-101972, BELL-CVE-2026-92499, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-92499, GHSA-5fwr-5mg2-3p42, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-92499

## What is CVE-2026-92499?

CVE-2026-92499 is an use after free vulnerability in Linux, published on 17 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: validate readdir offset before accessing dirent

A corrupted directory can trigger the following KASAN report when
ext4_readdir() resumes from an invalid position:

  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x5ef/0x820
  Read of size 2 at addr ffff88810a646000 by task repro_linear/509

  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
   print_report+0xd0/0x630
   kasan_report+0xce/0x100
   __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x5ef/0x820
   ext4_readdir+0xcde/0x2b70
   iterate_dir+0x1a1/0x520
   __x64_sys_getdents64+0x12b/0x220
   do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
   </TASK>

KASAN reports use-after-free because the out-of-bounds access lands in an
adjacent freed page. The directory buffer itself is still referenced.

ext4_dir_llseek() invalidates the directory cookie so that ext4_readdir()
rescans directory entries from the start of the block. The rescan checks
only the lower bound of rec_len before advancing. A corrupted rec_len can
therefore place the offset where the block has insufficient space for a
complete directory entry. The rescan itself may dereference that truncated
entry, or the main loop may pass it to __ext4_check_dir_entry(). The latter
reads de->rec_len before validating the range. For example:

  block offset  0                           4092  4096
                |---- de1.rec_len = 4092 -----|----|
                                               de2.inode
                                                    | de2.rec_len
                                                    ^ OOB, reported as UAF

de2 starts at offset 4092 in this 4 KiB block. Its four-byte inode fits in
the block, but its rec_len starts at offset 4096 and crosses the boundary.

The minimum safe length is inode-dependent. Encrypted and casefolded
directory entries need eight additional hash bytes, while a valid metadata
checksum tail is only 12 bytes.

Cache the metadata checksum feature state and derive the minimum directory
entry length from the on-disk format. Use it to bound both the rescan and
the offset passed to the main loop. Report an offset in a truncated block
tail and skip the remainder of the block, while continuing to accept an
offset exactly at the block boundary.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-92499?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-92499?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-92499 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-92499 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-92499 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-92499 is an use after free vulnerability in Linux, published on 17 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-92499 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-92499/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-92499/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-92499
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-92499
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-92499

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-92499/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.