CVE-2026-93201 dm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory

High 7.8 Published Updated

An attacker with CAP_SYS_ADMIN can trigger out-of-bounds memory access in the Linux kernel dm-pcache driver via crafted persistent memory metadata, potentially leading to code execution or privilege escalation.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Any signed-in user
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is CVE-2026-93201?

CVE-2026-93201 is a high-severity memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 17 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory

cache_pos_decode(), cache_key_decode() and the last-kset branches of cache_replay(), the writeback worker and the GC worker take a cache segment id from the cache device metadata and index cache->segments[] with it without checking it against cache->n_segs. That metadata is only CRC-protected with a fixed public seed, so whoever supplies the cache device on a table load (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) controls the id; an out-of-range value forms a wild pcache_cache_segment pointer that is dereferenced and written through -- an out-of-bounds read and write driven by on-disk data.

Add cache_seg_id_valid() and reject an out-of-range id at each decode site, failing the operation with -EIO instead of indexing past the array. Bound the id against the initialized-segment count (cache_info.n_segs) rather than the physical device total. A forged cache_info.n_segs below seg_num otherwise leaves segments[cache_info.n_segs..seg_num) as zeroed structs whose data pointer is NULL, so a forged id in that window would still be dereferenced. A later patch guarantees cache_info.n_segs <= seg_num, and a driver-created cache sets the two equal, so valid images are unaffected.

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-93201?

How do I fix CVE-2026-93201?

Apply the vendor's patch.

Upgrade to the fixed version. Memory-safe languages, compiler hardening and fuzzing prevent most new cases. More about Memory corruption.

Is CVE-2026-93201 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-93201 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Also known as BELL-CVE-2026-93201, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-93201, GHSA-rr92-7pj4-8whf, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-93201.

Is CVE-2026-93201 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free