# CVE-2026-97419: hsr: broadcast netlink notifications in the device's net namespace

> Privileged listeners in the initial network namespace can receive sensitive HSR device events from other namespaces, leaking MAC addresses and interface indices.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** An administrator
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 24 Sep 2026
- **Updated:** 3 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-103916, BELL-CVE-2026-97419, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-97419, GHSA-v886-hjg7-fghx, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97419

## What is CVE-2026-97419?

CVE-2026-97419 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 24 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

hsr: broadcast netlink notifications in the device's net namespace

The HSR generic netlink family sets .netnsok = true. HSR devices can
live in network namespaces other than init_net.

Two async notifiers broadcast events with genlmsg_multicast(). They
are hsr_nl_ringerror() and hsr_nl_nodedown(). That helper delivers
only on the default genl socket in init_net. So the events always land
in init_net. The network namespace of the device does not matter.

This has two effects. A listener in the device's own namespace never
sees its own ring error and node down events. A privileged listener in
init_net receives events from HSR devices in other namespaces. The
payload carries the peer node MAC (HSR_A_NODE_ADDR) and the slave port
ifindex (HSR_A_IFINDEX).

Switch both callers to genlmsg_multicast_netns(). Other families with
.netnsok = true already do this. Examples are gtp, ovpn, team,
batman-adv, netdev-genl, ethtool and handshake.

hsr_nl_ringerror() already has the slave port. It uses
dev_net(port->dev). hsr_nl_nodedown() takes the namespace from the
master port via hsr_port_get_hsr().

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-97419?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-97419?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-97419 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97419 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-97419 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-97419 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 24 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97419 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97419/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97419/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-97419
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97419
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-97419

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97419/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
