# CVE-2026-97529: scsi: qla2xxx: Validate BSG request_len before reading vendor_cmd[]

> A local attacker with CAP_SYS_RAWIO can trigger out-of-bounds heap reads in the qla2xxx driver, potentially leaking memory or causing a system panic.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** An administrator
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 25 Sep 2026
- **Updated:** 21 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-104634, BELL-CVE-2026-97529, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-97529, GHSA-f28v-rr9c-w68g, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97529

## What is CVE-2026-97529?

CVE-2026-97529 is a memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: qla2xxx: Validate BSG request_len before reading vendor_cmd[]

The FC BSG transport allocates job->request via memdup_user() using the
exact user-supplied request_len. For FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR,
fc_bsg_host_dispatch() only guarantees request_len covers msgcode and
vendor_id; it does not account for the vendor_cmd[] flexible array.

qla2xxx then reads the command selector vendor_cmd[0] and, in several
sub-handlers, vendor_cmd[1]/[2] or structures overlaid on the vendor
command area without verifying request_len. A caller holding
CAP_SYS_RAWIO can submit a short request whose vendor_id matches the
host, triggering out-of-bounds heap reads (KASAN-detectable, and able to
mis-select a command or panic).

Add a central guard in qla2x00_process_vendor_specific() so the selector
is always in bounds, restrict the early vendor_cmd[0] read in
qla24xx_bsg_request() to sufficiently long vendor messages, and add
request_len checks to the sub-handlers that read further:
qla24xx_proc_fcp_prio_cfg_cmd(), qla2x00_process_loopback(),
qla84xx_reset(), qla84xx_updatefw(), qla2x00_read_optrom(),
qla2x00_update_optrom(), qlafx00_mgmt_cmd() and
qla28xx_validate_flash_image().

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-97529?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-97529?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-97529 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97529 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-97529 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-97529 is a memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97529 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97529/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97529/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-97529
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97529
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-97529

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97529/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
