# CVE-2026-97570: bnxt_en: Bound SW TPA IDs to prevent crashes

> A missing bounds check in the bnxt_en network driver allows out-of-bounds memory access, leading to a kernel crash and denial of service.

- **Severity:** High 8.1 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 25 Sep 2026
- **Updated:** 19 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** DEBIAN-CVE-2026-97570, GHSA-j77v-wxhh-gw5h, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97570

## What is CVE-2026-97570?

CVE-2026-97570 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bnxt_en: Bound SW TPA IDs to prevent crashes

FW supports up to 1024 concurrent TPAs, so the FW TPA ID is in the range
0..1023 (see commit ec4d8e7cf024 ("bnxt_en: Add TPA ID mapping logic for
57500 chips.")). bnxt_alloc_agg_idx is intended to wrap the FW ID down to a
software ID which is used to index rxr->rx_tpa, and to generate a mapping
between FW IDs and the wrapped software ID.

On a 57608 with firmware version 233, the firmware advertises 32
concurrent TPAs. As of the commit under fixes, bp->max_tpa on this NIC
is set to 32.

If the software ID from bnxt_alloc_agg_idx is above 31, this results in
an invalid address being loaded on this line:

  tpa_info = &rxr->rx_tpa[agg_id];

because rx_tpa is allocated with only bp->max_tpa (32) entries. Writes
to tpa_info later in the code are out of bounds.

This bug results in a crash at boot:

Oops: general protection fault, kernel NULL pointer dereference 0x8: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
RIP: 0010:bnxt_rx_pkt+0xc0/0x1560
RSP: 0018:ffffc900009b8c78 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000048 RCX: 0000000206682516
RDX: ffffc900009b8db4 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 01ffffff038fe1c0
RBP: ffffc9006e687480 R08: ffffc9006e687000 R09: 0000000000003048
R10: 0000000000000480 R11: ffff8881c6083900 R12: 0000000006682516
R13: ffff8881c6095400 R14: 0000000000000016 R15: ffff8881c6b66680
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88fef3c77000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fc8bda40584 CR3: 000000807c812001 CR4: 0000000008772ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 ? __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x1ca/0x250
 __bnxt_poll_work+0x152/0x280
 bnxt_poll_p5+0x1cd/0x480
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x180
 net_rx_action+0x20b/0x3b0
 ? note_gp_changes+0x53/0xe0
 ? tick_setup_sched_timer+0x180/0x180
 ? __napi_schedule+0x9a/0xb0
 ? bnxt_msix+0x24/0x30
 handle_softirqs+0xdd/0x2c0
 __irq_exit_rcu.llvm.3171231171502365008+0x47/0xf0
 common_interrupt+0x85/0x90
 </IRQ>
 <TASK>
 asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40

This stack trace is from a crash triggered when an out of bounds rx_tpa
is dereferenced. The invalid write mentioned above is silent in this
particular crash.

Fix this by allocating rx_tpa with bp->max_tpa rounded up to the next
power of 2 (bp->max_tpa_roundup_size) entries and masking the FW TPA ID
with that size, so the wrapped ID can never index past the end of the
array.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-97570?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-97570?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-97570 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97570 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-97570 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-97570 is a high-severity vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97570 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97570/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97570/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-97570
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97570
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-97570

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97570/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
