# CVE-2026-97921: tracing: Free histogram the field rejected for a bad modifier

> A memory leak in the Linux kernel tracing subsystem allows local attackers to exhaust kernel memory by repeatedly writing invalid histogram triggers.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 25 Sep 2026
- **Updated:** 19 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-104810, BELL-CVE-2026-97921, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-97921, GHSA-v583-2w7f-r9gc, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97921

## What is CVE-2026-97921?

CVE-2026-97921 is a memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Free histogram the field rejected for a bad modifier

Writing a hist trigger whose value or variable carries a modifier that is
not allowed there leaks the fields that were built for it.

__create_val_field() takes the field from parse_expr() and stores it in
hist_data->fields[] only after the modifier checks have run:

	hist_field = parse_expr(hist_data, file, field_str, flags, var_name,
				&n_subexprs);
	...
	if (hist_field->flags & HIST_FIELD_FL_VAR) {
		if (hist_field->flags & (...))
			goto err;
	} else {
		if (hist_field->flags & (...))
			goto err;
	}

	hist_data->fields[val_idx] = hist_field;

Both checks jump past that store, and the err label returns without
freeing anything. The error unwinds to create_hist_data(), which calls
destroy_hist_data() -> destroy_hist_fields(), and that reaches a field
only by walking fields[]. A field that never got there is unreachable.

commit e0213434fe3e ("tracing: Do not let histogram values have some
modifiers") set ret to -EINVAL and fell through to the store, which left
the field owned by fields[] and freed along with the rest of hist_data.
Splitting the check into a value case and a variable case replaced that
fall-through with a goto that skips it.

With CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK, 200 writes of

  # echo 'hist:keys=prev_pid:vals=next_pid.log2' > \
	 events/sched/sched_switch/trigger

each correctly rejected with -EINVAL, leave 332 unreferenced objects
(63744 bytes) reported at create_hist_field(); 200 install and remove
cycles of a valid trigger leave none. A '.log2' field is two
allocations, since create_hist_field() puts the plain field in
operands[0] of the log2 field, and both are reported.

Use destroy_hist_field() rather than __destroy_hist_field() so that
operands[0] is freed as well. It returns early for HIST_FIELD_FL_VAR_REF,
which is what an operand owned by hist_data->var_refs[] needs; the
rejected field itself is never a var ref, because a var ref never carries
a modifier flag.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-97921?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-97921?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-97921 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97921 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-97921 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-97921 is a memory corruption vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-97921 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97921/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97921/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-97921
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97921
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-97921

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-97921/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
