{"answers":{"affected":"","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-98084 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Apply the vendor's patch.","what":"CVE-2026-98084 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for CVE-2026-98084 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: CVE-2026-98084 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 25 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-98084 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98084/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98084/index.md)","id":"CVE-2026-98084","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98084/index.md","name":"CVE-2026-98084","record":{"aliases":["AZL-104294","BELL-CVE-2026-98084","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-98084","GHSA-hcwg-2fch-4v4c","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98084"],"analysis":{"component_type":"kernel","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["privilege_escalation","code_execution"],"network_reachable":"adjacent_or_local","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Linux kernel BPF","requires_auth":"low_privilege","summary":"A flaw in the Linux kernel BPF verifier allows loading unsafe programs, potentially leading to privilege escalation or code execution.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"security_feature_bypass"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":"Linux","cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":null,"severity":null,"source":null,"vector":null,"version":null},"cwes":[],"description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: backtracking shouldn't clear outer frame R1-R5 for callbacks\n\nWhen processing calls to bpf_loop() verifier marks R1 (and R4) as\nprecise. R1 tracks loop iterations number and because of the\n'callback_depth \u003c R1' mechanics in check_helper_call() must be marked\nprecise. However, precision propagation for R1 was broken,\nwhen bpf_loop() call was verified on a second iteration.\n\nConsider the following verification trace:\n- main: bpf_loop(nr_loops, callback ...)\n- callback: BPF_EXIT\n- main: bpf_loop(nr_loops, callback ...)\n- ...\n\nWhile the first visit of the call to bpf_loop() propagated R1\nprecision as expected, the second call to mark_chain_precision() in\nthe check_helper_call() set R1, but it was immediately reset when\nbacktrack_insn() processed preceding BPF_EXIT in the loop deleted in\nthis patch.\n\nBecause of that, the second visit of the call to bpf_loop() injected\ncheckpoint with R1 not marked as precise. Which could trick the\nverifier into accepting unsafe programs. See the next patch for an\nexample of such program.\n\nCommit is structured in a way to minimize conflicts when\n'bpf' would be eventually merged with 'bpf-next'.","ecosystems":[],"exploits":{"exploitdb":0,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":0,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":0,"nuclei":0,"refs":[],"tier":"none_known"},"has_fix":true,"headline":"bpf: backtracking shouldn't clear outer frame R1-R5 for callbacks","id":"CVE-2026-98084","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"cve","links":{"ecosystem":null,"product":null,"products":[],"type":"security_feature_bypass","year":"2026"},"n_packages":0,"n_references":5,"next":{"headline":"bpf: backtrack_insn(): Handle ld_{abs,ind} subprog exit edge","id":"CVE-2026-98085"},"packages":[],"prev":{"headline":"btrfs: fix transaction use-after-free in raid stripe insertion","id":"CVE-2026-98083"},"products":["Linux"],"published":"2026-09-25","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CVE Terms of Use (MITRE)","name":"CVE List","prefix":"CVE"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":"PUBLISHED","updated":"2026-10-21","vendors":["Linux"]},"summary":"A flaw in the Linux kernel BPF verifier allows loading unsafe programs, potentially leading to privilege escalation or code execution.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98084/"}