# CVE-2026-98163: cgroup: Avoid iteration of dying tasks with zero refcount

> A race condition in the Linux kernel cgroup iterator allows accessing freed task structures, potentially leading to use-after-free and privilege escalation.

- **Severity:** High 7.8 (`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`)
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 26 Sep 2026
- **Updated:** 19 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** DEBIAN-CVE-2026-98163, GHSA-qwg6-2j4v-5xw5, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98163

## What is CVE-2026-98163?

CVE-2026-98163 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 26 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

cgroup: Avoid iteration of dying tasks with zero refcount

The commit 260fbcb92bbea ("cgroup: Move dying_tasks cleanup from
cgroup_task_release() to cgroup_task_free()") extended the lifetime of
tasks on the dying_tasks list.
The iterators have provision to go through dying_tasks because of
dying threadgroup leaders or explicit CSS_TASK_ITER_WITH_DEAD, however,
it was expected that such tasks can obtain a new reference (that is
possible before cgroup_task_release()/put_task_struct_rcu_user()).
The tasks after cgroup_task_release() and before cgroup_task_free()
are subject to race when they may or may not have ->usage count > 0.

The race window is between css_task_iter_next() invocations
when css_set_lock is released and we may arrive at a new ->task_pos.
The iterator should not attempt to resurrect tasks whose ->usage count
dropped to zero. (When that happens, __put_task_struct_rcu_cb() is
already imminent and the returned task_struct would could be used
after free.)

As for the fix, we cannot simply check the signal->live count of a task
on the dying list because that won't distinguish regular zombies waiting
to be reaped from RCU remnant tasks that are going to be free'd.
Therefore add an extra check to rule out ->usage==0 tasks from any
iteration.

The repeat: loop in css_task_iter_advance() doesn't consider ->usage
count, so add a new loop to css_task_iter_next() to skip de-used tasks
on the dying_list.

Rough illustration of the possible race

  R (reader of cgroup.procs)         T (thread)                       L (group leader)
  ---------------------------------  -------------------------------- --------------------------------
                                                                      L exits, signal->live > 0
                                                                      cgroup_task_dead(L)
                                                                        css_set_skip_task_iters() // skips only cset->tasks
                                                                        list_add_tail(&L->cg_list, &cset->dying_tasks)
  css_task_iter_next()
    take css_set_lock
    css_task_iter_advance()
      leader && signal->live != 0
      => it->task_pos = &L->cg_list
    release css_set_lock
                                     T exits
                                     --signal->live == 0
				     cgroup_task_dead(T) // css_set_lock
                                     release_task(T)
                                       cgroup_task_release(T)
                                       release_task(L) // zap_leader
                                         cgroup_task_release(L)
                                         put_task_struct_rcu_user(L)
                                         ...RCU...
                                         put_task_struct(L)
                                           L->usage = 0
                                           /* L still on dying_tasks */
                                           ...RCU...
                                           __put_task_struct(L)
  css_task_iter_next() // another iteration
    take css_set_lock
    it->task_pos = &L->cg_list
    get_task_struct(L)
      => addition on 0
    drop css_set_lock
                                           cgroup_task_free(L)
                                             css_set_skip_task_iters() // dying skip comes too late
                                           free_task(L)
  cgroup_procs_show()
    task_pid_vnr(L)

Weakness: CWE-416 (Use After Free), CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-98163?

It affects 1 product.


Products: Linux kernel.

## How do I fix CVE-2026-98163?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-98163 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-98163 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

- [CVE-2026-53266](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53266/): Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-6282](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-6282/): Linux Kernel Improper Input Validation (high 8.8, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2022-0185](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2022-0185/): Linux Kernel Heap-Based Buffer Overflow (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2013-2094](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2013-2094/): Linux Kernel Privilege Escalation (high 8.4, exploited in the wild)
- [CVE-2026-53362](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-53362/): Linux Kernel Unspecified (high 7.8, exploited in the wild)

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-98163 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-98163 is a high-severity use after free vulnerability in Linux kernel, published on 26 Sep 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-98163 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux kernel. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98163/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98163/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-98163
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98163
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-98163

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98163/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.