# CVE-2026-98811: net/sched: cls_api: reclaim an empty proto on the error path

> A race condition in the Linux kernel's traffic control classifier allows local attackers to leak kernel memory and references, potentially leading to denial of service.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Any signed-in user
- **Attackable:** Local or same network only
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 18 Oct 2026
- **Updated:** 21 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-109377, BELL-CVE-2026-98811, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-98811, GHSA-8rvg-cc82-cvp9, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98811

## What is CVE-2026-98811?

CVE-2026-98811 is a denial of service vulnerability in Linux, published on 18 Oct 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: cls_api: reclaim an empty proto on the error path

Two racing tc filter add requests on the same chain/prio of an
unlocked classifier both run change() on the shared proto and both
can fail: the winner's tcf_chain_tp_delete_empty() attempt gives up
because the loser's handle is still in the idr, and the loser's
error path drops only its own reference without a second reclamation
attempt. The empty proto stays linked in the chain, holding the
chain reference, a block reference and the classifier module
reference until the chain or block is torn down.

Reclaim the proto on the error path of any failed request that holds
a proto reference. The reclamation is emptiness-gated:
tcf_chain_tp_delete_empty() unlinks the proto only when
delete_empty() admits it is empty, so a live shared proto is never
unlinked. A proto the request created is reclaimed unconditionally -
it is the only owner, so marking it for deletion is safe even without
a delete_empty callback. Classifiers without one (the check marks the
proto unconditionally) are rtnl-serialized, so the raced window this
guard closes cannot arise for them.

This is a follow-up to commit d4e359b3608a ("net/sched: cls_api: fix
teardown of an adopted proto on insert-race loss"), which stopped the
loser of the insert race from unlinking the winner's live proto but
left the empty-proto residual in place.

Conditions to recreate:
- CONFIG_NET_CLS_FLOWER=y; veth pair
- tc qdisc add dev veth0 ingress
- two concurrent `tc filter add dev veth0 ingress protocol ip pref 1
  flower skip_sw ... action drop` (both fail in fl_hw_replace_filter
  after publishing their handle in the idr); repeat in a loop
- an empty flower tp stays linked after both requests fail; visible
  as a bare `filter protocol ip pref 1 flower chain 0` header in
  `tc filter show` with no filter entries
- CAP_NET_ADMIN (namespace-local via unshare -Urn suffices)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-98811?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-98811?

Apply the vendor's patch.

## Is CVE-2026-98811 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-98811 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-98811 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-98811 is a denial of service vulnerability in Linux, published on 18 Oct 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-98811 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98811/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98811/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-98811
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98811
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-98811

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-98811/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.