# CVE-2026-99001: drm/xe/i2c: cancel the client work on remove


- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 23 Oct 2026
- **Updated:** 23 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** BELL-CVE-2026-99001, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-99001, GHSA-fx73-8c7h-m232, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-99001

## What is CVE-2026-99001?

CVE-2026-99001 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 23 Oct 2026. 

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/xe/i2c: cancel the client work on remove

xe_i2c_notifier() stores the DesignWare adapter in i2c->adapter and
schedules i2c->work when the adapter is registered under the xe I2C
platform device, and xe_i2c_client_work() then instantiates the AMC
client device on that adapter.

xe_i2c_remove() tears down the AMC, unregisters the client devices,
the bus notifier and the adapter platform device, but it never drains
i2c->work. A work item that is still queued or running when the
adapter is unregistered dereferences i2c->adapter in
i2c_new_client_device() after platform_device_unregister() has
released the adapter. The work item is also embedded in the
devm-allocated struct xe_i2c, so a work item still queued after the
drm device devm unwind frees that allocation runs its callback on
freed memory.

The bus notifier is the only thing that schedules this work, and it is
unregistered after the client devices. An instance that is still queued
when the teardown runs can therefore write
i2c->client[XE_I2C_CLIENT_AMC] while the loop is unregistering and
clearing the same array, and an AMC client it instantiates late is only
cleaned up by the adapter's own child sweep in i2c_del_adapter().

Move bus_unregister_notifier() in front of the client teardown loop
and cancel the work right after it, so no new instance can be
scheduled and a queued instance is drained before the client array is
touched. A running instance still finds a live adapter, since the
adapter is unregistered later.

(cherry picked from commit a23f27d5ec11c3f418c5e5531eea34ccda2b5b20)

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-99001?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-99001?

Upgrade to a fixed version.

## Is CVE-2026-99001 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-99001 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-99001 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-99001 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 23 Oct 2026. 
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-99001 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99001/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99001/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-99001
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-99001
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-99001

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99001/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
