# CVE-2026-99178: x86/kvm: Don't consume async #PF flags on a kernel #PF in NMI context


- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 28 Oct 2026
- **Updated:** 28 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-111335, BELL-CVE-2026-99178, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-99178, GHSA-9w29-5gpq-xmv3, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-99178

## What is CVE-2026-99178?

CVE-2026-99178 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 28 Oct 2026. 

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/kvm: Don't consume async #PF flags on a kernel #PF in NMI context

An async #PF "page not present" event arrives through the #PF vector,
and its reason sits in the per-CPU apf_reason.flags until
__kvm_handle_async_pf() reads and clears it. If an NMI arrives after
the event is injected and before the #PF handler reads the flags, and
the NMI handler itself takes a #PF, that fault reads and clears the
flags belonging to the #PF it interrupted. It then finds interrupts
disabled in the NMI context it interrupted, and panics:

  Kernel panic - not syncing: Host injected async #PF in interrupt
disabled region
  Call Trace:
   <NMI>
   panic+0x52/0x60
   __kvm_handle_async_pf+0xb0/0xb0
   exc_page_fault+0x71/0xb0
   asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
  RIP: 0010:__get_user_nocheck_8+0x6/0x20
   perf_callchain_user+0x147/0x1a0
   get_perf_callchain+0x12d/0x1c0
   ...
   perf_event_nmi_handler+0x26/0x50
   exc_nmi+0xe8/0x110
  RIP: 0010:asm_exc_page_fault+0x0/0x30
   </NMI>

The last RIP line shows the NMI landing on the first instruction of
the #PF entry. perf with user call chains takes such a fault: the
sampling NMI walks the user stack with __get_user(), which faults when
a saved frame pointer is not a valid user address or the walk runs off
the top of the stack. The same window exists when KVM, running as an
L1 hypervisor with DELIVERY_AS_PF_VMEXIT, reads the flags itself after
a #PF VM-exit.

The NMI entry code saves and restores CR2 for this nesting, but not the
async #PF reason. Andy Lutomirski described the race, with perf as the
example, when async #PF delivery was reworked in 2020 [1]. Saving and
clearing the flags across the NMI, next to CR2, was discussed there but
not merged.

Since that rework, Linux has stopped setting KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS,
so the host delivers "page not present" only for user mode faults and
a kernel-mode fault in NMI context (including kernel-mode #MC and #DB)
cannot be an async page fault.  In that case, return without touching
the flags so that the interrupted handler finds them intact.

Tested on v7.3-rc5 in a 4-vCPU, 2 GiB guest restored from a snapshot
whose memory is served on demand through userfaultfd, so that reading
it back takes async #PFs, while every thread samples hardware cycles
with user call chains and points its frame pointer at an unmapped page.
Without this patch the guest panicked as above in 3 of 3 runs. With it,
the guest survived 3 of 3 runs of 60 seconds, and the host counted
148,441 to 153,334 kvm_async_pf_not_present events in the first 20
seconds of each. On 6.18.50 the results were the same: the guest
panicked without the patch and survived with it.

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-99178?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-99178?

Upgrade to a fixed version.

## Is CVE-2026-99178 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-99178 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-99178 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-99178 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 28 Oct 2026. 
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-99178 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99178/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99178/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-99178
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-99178
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-99178

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99178/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.