# CVE-2026-99204: ocfs2/dlm: Protect the recovery list during debugfs reads


- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 28 Oct 2026
- **Updated:** 28 Oct 2026
- **Also known as:** AZL-111368, BELL-CVE-2026-99204, DEBIAN-CVE-2026-99204, GHSA-h9q4-gj29-45hp, UBUNTU-CVE-2026-99204

## What is CVE-2026-99204?

CVE-2026-99204 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 28 Oct 2026. 

### Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ocfs2/dlm: Protect the recovery list during debugfs reads

Recovery participant records must remain alive while debug_state_print()
walks reco.node_data and formats their fields. The formatter holds
dlm->spinlock, but the recovery participant list is protected by
dlm_reco_state_lock. In particular, dlm_destroy_recovery_area() detaches
the list under dlm_reco_state_lock and frees the detached records after
releasing it. A concurrent debugfs open can therefore read freed memory.

Protect the participant traversal and field reads in debug_state_print()
with dlm_reco_state_lock, matching the existing list writers. This also
serializes the traversal against list_add_tail() during recovery-area
initialization. Make the existing lock available to the debug code
through dlmcommon.h; the lock remains internal to the OCFS2 DLM module.

Release dlm->spinlock after formatting the other domain state and before
acquiring dlm_reco_state_lock, so the debug reader does not nest the two
locks. Leave recovery list insertion, detachment and freeing unchanged.

KASAN report as below:

    BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in debug_state_open+0x1169/0x12d0
    Read of size 4 at addr ffff88810662ef80 by task dlm-state-stres/896

    CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 896 Comm: dlm-state-stres Not tainted 7.3.0-rc4-next-20260921-pmb-ocfs2-functional-v1+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
    Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
    Call Trace:
     <TASK>
     dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0
     print_report+0xce/0x630
     ? debug_state_open+0x1169/0x12d0
     ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
     ? __virt_addr_valid+0x20e/0x420
     ? debug_state_open+0x1169/0x12d0
     kasan_report+0xe0/0x110
     ? debug_state_open+0x1169/0x12d0
     debug_state_open+0x1169/0x12d0
     ? __pfx_debug_state_open+0x10/0x10
     full_proxy_open_regular+0x193/0x310
     do_dentry_open+0x595/0x12d0
     ? __pfx_full_proxy_open_regular+0x10/0x10
     vfs_open_consume+0xd1/0x400
     ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
     path_openat+0x18d0/0x2020
     ? __pfx_path_openat+0x10/0x10
     do_file_open+0x21e/0x470
     ? __pfx_do_file_open+0x10/0x10
     ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x23/0x40
     ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
     ? alloc_fd+0x3a6/0x6b0
     do_sys_openat2+0xf4/0x1b0
     ? __pfx_do_sys_openat2+0x10/0x10
     ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
     ? __fput+0x5b5/0xa60
     __x64_sys_openat+0x136/0x1e0
     ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
     do_syscall_64+0x114/0x620
     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
    [Register dump omitted.]
     </TASK>

    Allocated by task 880:
     kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
     kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
     __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0
     __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x28d/0x610
     dlm_remaster_locks+0x147/0x1d90
     dlm_do_recovery+0xde1/0x1580
     dlm_recovery_thread+0x109/0x300
     kthread+0x351/0x460
     ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
     ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

    Freed by task 880:
     kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
     kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
     kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60
     __kasan_slab_free+0x5f/0x80
     kfree+0x308/0x580
     dlm_destroy_recovery_area+0x285/0x460
     dlm_remaster_locks+0x17c4/0x1d90
     dlm_do_recovery+0xde1/0x1580
     dlm_recovery_thread+0x109/0x300
     kthread+0x351/0x460
     ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
     ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

    The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810662ef80
     which belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32
    The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of
     freed 32-byte region [ffff88810662ef80, ffff88810662efa0)

    [Page and memory-state dumps omitted.]

## Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-99204?


## How do I fix CVE-2026-99204?

Upgrade to a fixed version.

## Is CVE-2026-99204 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-99204 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for CVE-2026-99204 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: CVE-2026-99204 is a vulnerability in Linux, published on 28 Oct 2026. 
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of CVE-2026-99204 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected product: Linux. No package-level version data is available, so check the vendor advisory linked from the reference page.

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99204/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99204/index.md)
```

## Sources

- CVE record: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-99204
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-99204
- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-99204

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-2026-99204/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
