GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f ZeptoClaw: Email Sender Spoofing to bypass Header-Only From Allowlist Validation
Attackers can spoof email headers to bypass sender allowlists in ZeptoClaw if upstream email authentication is weak, allowing unauthorized message processing.
- Exploited in the wild
- Not known
- Login needed
- Not needed
- Attackable
- Over the internet
- Victim action needed
- Not needed
- Fix
- Available
What is GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f?
GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f is an authentication bypass vulnerability in zeptoclaw, published on 12 Mar 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Official description
Summary
The email channel authorizes senders based on the parsed From header identity only. If upstream email authentication/enforcement is weak (for example, relaxed SPF/DKIM/DMARC handling), an attacker can spoof an allowlisted sender address and have the message treated as trusted input.
Details
Relevant code paths:
src/channels/email_channel.rs:311extracts sender identity from parsed message headers:let from = parsed.from() ... a.address() ...
src/channels/email_channel.rs:328authorizes using thatfromvalue:if !self.is_sender_allowed(&from) { ... }
src/channels/email_channel.rs:87onward (is_sender_allowed) performs allowlist/domain matching against the same header-derived value.- There is no in-channel validation of sender authenticity indicators such as SPF/DKIM/DMARC results before allowlist trust decisions.
Result:
- Trust decision is based on a potentially spoofable header field unless mailbox/provider-side anti-spoofing controls are strong and enforced.
PoC
- Configure email channel with strict sender allowlist:
channels.email.enabled = truechannels.email.allowed_senders = ["[email protected]"]channels.email.deny_by_default = true
- Ensure the monitored mailbox accepts or forwards a spoofed message (for testing, use a local SMTP path that does not enforce sender authentication strongly).
- Send an email to the monitored inbox with forged header identity:
python - <<'PY'
import smtplib
from email.message import EmailMessage
msg = EmailMessage()
msg["From"] = "[email protected]" # forged trusted sender
msg["To"] = "[email protected]"
msg["Subject"] = "forged control message"
msg.set_content("FORGED EMAIL CONTENT")
# Example test SMTP endpoint
with smtplib.SMTP("127.0.0.1", 25) as s:
s.send_message(msg)
PY
- Wait for IMAP fetch/IDLE processing.
- Observe the message is accepted as allowlisted sender
[email protected]and published as inbound channel input.
Impact
- Vulnerability type: sender identity spoofing risk due to header-based authorization.
- Affected deployments: those using email channel allowlists where upstream anti-spoof controls are weak, misconfigured, or bypassed.
- Security effect:
- Spoofed
Fromheaders may bypass logical sender allowlist. - Malicious content can enter trusted automation/agent flows as if sent by authorized identities.
- Spoofed
- Risk is reduced in environments with strict SPF/DKIM/DMARC enforcement and strong inbound mail hygiene, but not eliminated at application layer.
Patch Recommendation
Add a sender-authentication gate in src/channels/email_channel.rs immediately after parsing from (src/channels/email_channel.rs:311) and before allowlist enforcement (src/channels/email_channel.rs:328). The gate should require trusted SPF/DKIM/DMARC evidence with domain alignment (for example, DMARC=pass, or aligned SPF/DKIM pass) before is_sender_allowed is evaluated. For backward compatibility, add a configurable mode in EmailConfig (for example, sender_verification_mode), but recommend hardened settings in production: dmarc_aligned, exact-address allowlists, and deny_by_default=true.
Which versions are affected by GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f?
2 open source packages ship an affected version, including zeptoclaw.
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
zeptoclaw crates.io | All versions | 0.7.6 |
zeptoclaw crates.io | All versions | 0.7.6 |
How do I fix GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f?
Upgrade zeptoclaw to 0.7.6 or later.
Upgrade, and rotate credentials and sessions that may have been exposed. More about Authentication bypass.
Is GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f being exploited?
There is no known exploitation of GHSA-4cm8-xpfv-jv6f in the wild and no public exploit code.