GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8 zeptoclaw has Shell allowlist-blocklist bypass via command/argument injection and file name wildcards

Not scored Published

Attackers can bypass shell command restrictions in zeptoclaw via injection techniques, leading to arbitrary code execution.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Any signed-in user
Attackable
Over the internet
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8?

GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8 is a command injection vulnerability in zeptoclaw, published on 5 Mar 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

Summary

zeptoclaw implements a allowlist combined with a blocklist to prevent malicious shell commands in src/security/shell.rs. However, even in the Strict mode, attackers can completely bypass all the guards from allowlist and blocklist:

  • to bypass the allowlist, command injection is enough, such as ;, $() etc.
  • to bypass the REGEX_BLOCKED_PATTERNS, argument injection is enough, such as the python3 -P -c "..."
  • to bypass the LITERAL_BLOCKED_PATTERNS, file name wildcards can do the work, such as cat /etc/pass[w]d

Details

In code src/security/shell.rs#L218-L243, one can see the allowlist only checks the first token and thus makes command injection possible.

        // Allowlist check (runs after blocklist)
        if self.allowlist_mode != ShellAllowlistMode::Off && !self.allowlist.is_empty() {
            let first_token = command
                .split_whitespace()
                .next()
                .unwrap_or("")
                .to_lowercase();
            // Strip path prefix (e.g. /usr/bin/git -> git)
            let executable = first_token.rsplit('/').next().unwrap_or(&first_token);
            if !self.allowlist.iter().any(|a| a == executable) {
                match self.allowlist_mode {
                    ShellAllowlistMode::Strict => {
                        return Err(ZeptoError::SecurityViolation(format!(
                            "Command '{}' not in allowlist",
                            executable
                        )));
                    }
                    ShellAllowlistMode::Warn => {
                        tracing::warn!(
                            command = %command,
                            executable = %executable,
                            "Command not in allowlist"
                        );
                    }
                    ShellAllowlistMode::Off => {} // unreachable
                }

!self.allowlist.is_empty() makes the empty allowlist overlook the allowlist check, if it is in ShellAllowlistMode::Strict mode, empty allowlist should direct reject all the commands.

As the code in src/security/shell.rs#L18-L70, we can find the REGEX_BLOCKED_PATTERNS only apply \s+ in between the command and arguments, making argument injection possible, and the LITERAL_BLOCKED_PATTERNS just uses specific file name, totally overlooking the file name wildcards:

const REGEX_BLOCKED_PATTERNS: &[&str] = &[
    // Piped shell execution (curl/wget to sh/bash)
    r"curl\s+.*\|\s*(sh|bash|zsh)",
    r"wget\s+.*\|\s*(sh|bash|zsh)",
    r"\|\s*(sh|bash|zsh)\s*$",
    // Reverse shells
    r"bash\s+-i\s+>&\s*/dev/tcp",
    r"nc\s+.*-e\s+(sh|bash|/bin)",
    r"/dev/tcp/",
    r"/dev/udp/",
    // Destructive root operations (various flag orderings)
    r"rm\s+(-[rf]{1,2}\s+)*(-[rf]{1,2}\s+)*/\s*($|;|\||&)",
    r"rm\s+(-[rf]{1,2}\s+)*(-[rf]{1,2}\s+)*/\*\s*($|;|\||&)",
    // Format/overwrite disk
    r"mkfs(\.[a-z0-9]+)?\s",
    r"dd\s+.*if=/dev/(zero|random|urandom).*of=/dev/[sh]d",
    r">\s*/dev/[sh]d[a-z]",
    // System-wide permission changes
    r"chmod\s+(-R\s+)?777\s+/\s*$",
    r"chmod\s+(-R\s+)?777\s+/[a-z]",
    // Fork bombs
    r":\(\)\s*\{\s*:\|:&\s*\}\s*;:",
    r"fork\s*\(\s*\)",
    // Encoded/indirect execution (common blocklist bypasses)
    r"base64\s+(-d|--decode)",
    r"python[23]?\s+-c\s+",
    r"perl\s+-e\s+",
    r"ruby\s+-e\s+",
    r"node\s+-e\s+",
    r"\beval\s+",
    r"xargs\s+.*sh\b",
    r"xargs\s+.*bash\b",
    // Environment variable exfiltration
    r"\benv\b.*>\s*/",
    r"\bprintenv\b.*>\s*/",
];

/// Literal substring patterns (credentials, sensitive paths)
const LITERAL_BLOCKED_PATTERNS: &[&str] = &[
    "/etc/shadow",
    "/etc/passwd",
    "~/.ssh/",
    ".ssh/id_rsa",
    ".ssh/id_ed25519",
    ".ssh/id_ecdsa",
    ".ssh/id_dsa",
    ".ssh/authorized_keys",
    ".aws/credentials",
    ".kube/config",
    // ZeptoClaw's own config (contains API keys and channel tokens)
    ".zeptoclaw/config.json",
    ".zeptoclaw/config.yaml",
];

PoC

    #[test]
    fn test_allowlist_bypass() {
        let config =
            ShellSecurityConfig::new().with_allowlist(vec!["git"], ShellAllowlistMode::Strict);
        assert!(config.validate_command("/usr/bin/git status; python -P -c 'import os; os.system(\"rm -rf /\")'; cat /etc/pass[w]d").is_ok());
    }

Impact

Unauthorized command execution.

Credit

@zpbrent

Which versions are affected by GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8?

2 open source packages ship an affected version, including zeptoclaw.

PackageAffectedFixed in
zeptoclaw crates.ioAll versions0.6.2
zeptoclaw crates.ioAll versions0.6.2

How do I fix GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8?

Upgrade zeptoclaw to 0.6.2 or later.

Upgrade, and pass arguments to programs as a list instead of through a shell. More about Command injection.

Is GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Is GHSA-5wp8-q9mx-8jx8 in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free