GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8 `Api.getUserData` (legacy) and `Api.get_userdata` are declared with `@permission(Perms.ANY)` and are reachable at `/api/getUserDa
Low-privilege users can brute-force administrator passwords via exposed API endpoints due to a flawed permission check, leading to full account takeover.
- Exploited in the wild
- Not known
- Login needed
- Any signed-in user
- Attackable
- Over the internet
- Victim action needed
- Not needed
- Fix
- None listed
What is GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8?
GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8 is a missing authorization vulnerability in pyload-ng, published on 9 Oct 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.
Official description
Summary
Api.getUserData (legacy) and Api.get_userdata are declared with @permission(Perms.ANY) and are reachable at /api/getUserData and /api/get_userdata. Because Perms.ANY == 0 and pyLoad's permission check is a bitmask AND, that gate is a no-op: every authenticated account passes, including one holding zero permission bits.
Both methods are thin wrappers around check_auth(), which the maintainers deliberately restricted to administrators by omitting @permission (no entry in perm_map, so is_authorized() returns False for non-admins). The wrappers undo that protection.
An attacker holding the lowest-privileged account in the system therefore has a clean binary oracle on the administrator password, with no account lockout anywhere in the codebase, and with the 100 req/min rate limiter bypassable by rotating X-Forwarded-For.
Affected code
src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1446 and :1464
#: Old API
@permission(Perms.ANY)
@get
def getUserData(self, username: str, password: str) -> OldUserData:
"""
similar to `check_auth` but returns UserData type.
"""
user = self.check_auth(username, password)
...
@permission(Perms.ANY)
@get
def get_userdata(self, username: str, password: str) -> UserData:
user = self.check_auth(username, password)
...
Root cause
src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:57
class Perms(IntFlag):
ANY = 0 #: requires no permission, but login
src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:108
def has_permission(user_perms: Perms, required_perms: Perms):
return required_perms == (user_perms & required_perms)
For required_perms == 0 this evaluates to 0 == (user_perms & 0) → 0 == 0 → always True. The @permission(Perms.ANY) gate therefore admits every authenticated principal regardless of which permission bits they hold.
Contrast with the intended admin-only primitive, src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py:1396:
@legacy("checkAuth")
@get
def check_auth(self, username: str, password: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
check_auth has no @permission; is_authorized() at api/__init__.py:1430 returns False for non-admins. The two wrappers carry Perms.ANY and restore access for everyone.
Because both wrappers also carry @get, they are placed in method_map and are directly routable via /api/<func>.
Amplifiers
1. No lockout. There is no failed-login counter, delay, or ban anywhere in the codebase. A failed guess costs the attacker only one PBKDF2 computation.
2. Rate limiting is bypassable. /api/* applies rate_limit(count=100, period=60) (src/pyload/webui/app/blueprints/api_blueprint.py:25), which buckets on a fully client-controlled header (src/pyload/webui/app/helpers.py:446):
client_ip = flask.request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-For", "").split(",")[0].strip() \
or flask.request.remote_addr
Rotating X-Forwarded-For per request yields a fresh bucket each time. Notably, is_loopback_request() in the same file (helpers.py:288-294) explicitly treats the presence of X-Forwarded-For / X-Real-IP / Forwarded as untrustworthy — the same guard was evidently not applied inside rate_limit().
Impact
Online brute force of the administrator account leading to full administrative takeover. A successful response additionally discloses the target account's id, name, email, role, and permission bits.
Proof of concept
Verified against 0.5.0b3, commit a5b008958.
Setup: stock instance with admin pyload, plus a non-admin user bob created with role=USER and permission=0.
Step 1 — establish that bob is genuinely unprivileged:
GET /api/checkAuth?username=pyload&password=pyload -> 401 {"error": "Access denied"}
GET /api/getAllUserData -> 401 {"error": "Access denied"}
Step 2 — the flaw. Same user, same session, Perms.ANY gate:
GET /api/getUserData?username=pyload&password=WRONG
-> 200 {"name": null, "email": null, "role": null, "permission": null, "template_name": null}
GET /api/getUserData?username=pyload&password=pyload
-> 200 {"name": "pyload", "email": "", "role": 0, "permission": 0, "template_name": "default"}
role: 0 is Role.ADMIN. get_userdata behaves identically. This is a perfect yes/no oracle.
Step 3 — measured brute force and recovery. Run as bob (permission = 0), admin password set to a 2-character value, X-Forwarded-For rotated on every request:
attempts : 667
elapsed : 39.7s (16.8 guesses/sec)
429 rate-limits : 0
account lockout : NONE - same session authenticated throughout
RECOVERED SECRET : 'zq' (true value 'zq') match=True
Step 4 — full takeover with the recovered secret:
POST /login as pyload/<recovered> -> HTTP 302 (authenticated as admin)
GET /api/getAllUserData (admin-only) -> HTTP 200 (full user dump)
Measured throughput is 17-47 guesses/sec/thread. The only bound is PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 at 100,000 iterations in src/pyload/core/database/user_database.py:14, not any rate limit.
Suggested remediation
- Remove
@permission(Perms.ANY)fromgetUserDataandget_userdata, or drop them entirely — they are legacy compatibility shims, and modern callers already use the admin-onlycheck_auth. - Structurally:
Perms.ANY = 0makeshas_permission()vacuous, so any method decorated@permission(Perms.ANY)silently becomes public to every logged-in user. GiveANYa real bit value, or handle it explicitly inhas_permission()as "requires an authenticated session". - Do not trust
X-Forwarded-Forunless a trusted-proxy deployment is explicitly configured. Otherwise bucketrate_limit()onrequest.remote_addr, or add the same guardis_loopback_request()already uses. - Add per-account failed-authentication throttling or lockout.
- Consider
hmac.compare_digest()in_check_password()(src/pyload/core/database/user_database.py:61uses a plain==on the derived hash, contradicting the "always use compare_digest" guidance two files away).
Notes for triage
There is no 0.5.0b3 release on PyPI. The develop branch auto-publishes dev builds (setup.py:86 appends .dev<build> to the VERSION file); the newest at time of testing was 0.5.0b3.dev101. The Perms.ANY = 0 design is long-standing, but only the 0.5.0b3.dev* line was verified here — please confirm whether 0.5.0b2.* and 0.4.x are affected before finalizing the version range.
Which versions are affected by GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8?
2 open source packages ship an affected version, including pyload-ng.
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
pyload-ng PyPI | From 0.5.0b3.dev1 to 0.5.0b3.dev101 | None |
pyload-ng PyPI | From 0.5.0b3.dev1 to 0.5.0b3.dev101 | None |
How do I fix GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8?
No fix has been published for GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.
Upgrade, and check permissions on every request on the server, not only in the interface. More about Missing authorization.
Is GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8 being exploited?
There is no known exploitation of GHSA-68w4-83fh-f2w8 in the wild and no public exploit code.