GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq devices resource list treated as a blacklist by default

Not scored Published

runc treated device lists as blacklists by default, allowing malicious containers to access arbitrary devices if deny-all rules were missing.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Not needed
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq?

GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq is a vulnerability in github.com/opencontainers/runc, published on 20 Dec 2021. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

Impact

Contrary to the OCI runtime specification, runc's implementation of the linux.resources.devices list was a black-list by default. This means that users who created their own config.json objects and didn't prefix a deny-all rule ({"allow": false, "permissions": "rwm"} or equivalent) were not provided protection by the devices cgroup. This would allow malicious containers (with sufficient privileges) to create arbitrary device inodes (assuming they have CAP_MKNOD) and operate on any device inodes they may have access to (assuming they have regular Unix DAC permissions).

However, most (if not all) programs that make use of runc include this deny-all rule. This was most likely added before the specification mandated a white-list of devices, and the fact that all programs wrote their own deny-all rule obscured the existence of this bug for several years. In fact, even the specification's examples include a default deny-all rule! We therefore believe that while this is a security bug (and has been fixed as such), it was almost certainly not exploitable in the wild due to the inclusion of default deny-all rules by all known users of runc – hence why this advisory has low severity.

Patches

This issue has been fixed in a patch that was part of a larger rework of the devices cgroup code in runc – which lead to the discovery of this security bug. Users should upgrade to 1.0.0-rc91 as soon as it is released, or wait for your distribution to backport the relevant fixes.

Workarounds

If you are using runc directly, ensure that there is a deny-all entry at the beginning of linux.resources.devices – such an entry would look like {"allow": false, "permissions": "rwm"} (all other fields are ignored, though type must be set to "a" or null if it is present).

Users which consume runc through another program should check whether their containers are operating under a white-list – this can be done by reading /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/devices.list inside the container. If the file contains only the entry a *:* rwm (meaning the cgroup is in black-list mode, which likely means "allow all device access") then your containers are vulnerable to this issue.

As always, we recommend in the strongest possible terms that all of our users enable user namespaces on all of their workloads (or pressure their vendors to do so). User namespaces are one of the most significant defense-in-depth protections you can enable for containers, and have prevented many container-related vulnerabilities (both kernel 0days as well as bugs in container runtimes, such as this one).

References

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Which versions are affected by GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq?

3 open source packages ship an affected version, including github.com/opencontainers/runc.

PackageAffectedFixed in
github.com/opencontainers/runc GoAll versions1.0.0-rc91
github.com/opencontainers/runc GoAll versions1.0.0-rc91
github.com/opencontainers/runc GoAll versions1.0.0-rc91

How do I fix GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq?

Upgrade github.com/opencontainers/runc to 1.0.0-rc91 or later.

Is GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Also known as GO-2022-0396.

Is GHSA-g54h-m393-cpwq in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free