GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x Bleach linkify(parse_email=True) CPU exhaustion via unbounded email regex scanning

Not scored Published

Attackers can cause CPU exhaustion and denial of service in applications using Bleach's email linkification feature on untrusted input.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Not needed
Attackable
Over the internet
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
None listed

What is GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x?

GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x is a denial of service vulnerability in bleach, published on 16 Jun 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

Official description

Summary

Bleach 6.3.0 exposes a documented email-linkification path through bleach.linkify(..., parse_email=True). The implementation scans attacker-controlled text with EMAIL_RE.finditer() over the full character token and has no length, timeout, or linear prefilter before applying the dot-atom email regex. A non-email payload around 30 KB causes multi-second CPU consumption per request/call, creating a direct availability risk for applications that enable email linkification on user-submitted text.

Affected Product

  • Package: bleach
  • Ecosystem: pip
  • Affected versions: verified in 6.3.0; exact first affected version not established
  • Patched versions: none known at finalization time
  • Tested version: 6.3.0
  • Audit commit/tag: v6.3.0 / 5546d5dbce60d08ccb99d981778d74044d646d4e
  • PyPI sdist SHA256: 6f3b91b1c0a02bb9a78b5a454c92506aa0fdf197e1d5e114d2e00c6f64306d22

Vulnerability Details

  • CWE: CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity; related availability impact maps to CWE-400
  • Component: bleach/linkifier.py, build_email_re(), LinkifyFilter.handle_email_addresses()
  • Root cause: handle_email_addresses() calls self.email_re.finditer(text) on attacker-controlled text. EMAIL_RE includes a repeated dot-atom local-part pattern, so non-email strings such as repeated a. segments with no @ force repeated long failing scans.
  • Security boundary violated: user-submitted text processed by a documented safe linkification helper should not allow an attacker to impose superlinear CPU cost through non-email text.
  • Direct impact: per-request CPU exhaustion / denial-of-service risk in applications that enable parse_email=True on attacker-controlled text.
  • Chain impact, if any: one proof run observed an unrelated /health request delayed during a concurrent attack request, but this was not reliable across reviewer retests. Treat cross-request service degradation as environment-dependent supporting evidence, not the primary impact.
  • Severity estimate: Medium / availability-only. The feature is opt-in and deployment body limits/timeouts affect practical severity.

Relevant code path:

  • bleach/__init__.py:85-125: public linkify(text, ..., parse_email=False) constructs Linker(..., parse_email=parse_email) and calls linker.linkify(text).
  • bleach/linkifier.py:77-88: EMAIL_RE is compiled from the dot-atom email pattern.
  • bleach/linkifier.py:292-301: handle_email_addresses() applies self.email_re.finditer(text) to each character token.
  • bleach/linkifier.py:620-623: character tokens are routed into email handling only when parse_email is true.
  • docs/goals.rst:30-40: Bleach documents user comments, profile bios, and descriptions as target untrusted text use cases.
  • docs/linkify.rst:300-305: parse_email=True is the documented option for creating mailto: links.

Attack Preconditions

  • The consuming application enables the documented parse_email=True option, for example bleach.linkify(user_text, parse_email=True) or Linker(parse_email=True).linkify(user_text).
  • The attacker can submit text that reaches that linkification path. Authentication depends on the host application; a public comment form would make this unauthenticated, while account-only text fields require user privileges.
  • The application allows roughly 20-30 KB of text to reach Bleach and lacks a strict timeout or input cap before linkification.
  • No custom bounded email_re is supplied.

Reproduction

Minimal API trigger:

import bleach
payload = ("a." * 15000) + "a"
bleach.linkify(payload, parse_email=True)

The saved HTTP proof uses a local harness with POST /preview calling bleach.linkify(request_body, parse_email=True) and a control endpoint using parse_email=False on the same payload. The exploit sends baseline/control/attack requests over HTTP to 127.0.0.1.

Proof Evidence

The proof ran against Bleach 6.3.0 installed from the audited local checkout in an isolated temporary venv. It used Python 3.12.3 on Linux.

Measured HTTP proof results:

  • Payload: ("a." * 15000) + "a" (30001 bytes)
  • Normal baseline /preview mean: 0.001425 seconds
  • Same 30 KB payload with parse_email=False: 0.048349 seconds
  • Attack payload with parse_email=True: 8.719818 seconds
  • Slowdown versus the larger baseline/control mean: 180.35x
  • Requests sent by proof: 20

Evidence files: poc.py poc_results.json exploit_proof.py exploit_results.json

Scope and Limitations

  • This report does not claim XSS, authentication bypass, data disclosure, remote code execution, persistent crash, or persistent service outage.
  • parse_email=True is not the default. The affected path is a documented opt-in feature.
  • The exact first affected version is not established.
  • Practical impact depends on host application input limits, worker model, request timeout policy, and whether untrusted users can submit text to an email-linkification path.
  • A reviewer reproduced the direct CPU cost but did not reproduce the proof harness’s /health delay. The direct impact claim is therefore limited to per-request CPU exhaustion.
  • Bleach is marked deprecated in README.rst, and SECURITY.md has stale supported-version text, but the package still has a 2025 PyPI release and published Mozilla security reporting routes.

Which versions are affected by GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x?

2 open source packages ship an affected version, including bleach.

PackageAffectedFixed in
bleach PyPIAll versionsNone
bleach PyPIAll versionsNone

How do I fix GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x?

No fix has been published for GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

Upgrade, then put limits on request size, rate and nesting depth so one client cannot exhaust the service. More about Denial of service.

Is GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Is GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free