GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x Bleach linkify(parse_email=True) CPU exhaustion via unbounded email regex scanning
Attackers can cause CPU exhaustion and denial of service in applications using Bleach's email linkification feature on untrusted input.
- Exploited in the wild
- Not known
- Login needed
- Not needed
- Attackable
- Over the internet
- Victim action needed
- Not needed
- Fix
- None listed
What is GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x?
GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x is a denial of service vulnerability in bleach, published on 16 Jun 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Official description
Summary
Bleach 6.3.0 exposes a documented email-linkification path through bleach.linkify(..., parse_email=True). The implementation scans attacker-controlled text with EMAIL_RE.finditer() over the full character token and has no length, timeout, or linear prefilter before applying the dot-atom email regex. A non-email payload around 30 KB causes multi-second CPU consumption per request/call, creating a direct availability risk for applications that enable email linkification on user-submitted text.
Affected Product
- Package:
bleach - Ecosystem: pip
- Affected versions: verified in
6.3.0; exact first affected version not established - Patched versions: none known at finalization time
- Tested version:
6.3.0 - Audit commit/tag:
v6.3.0/5546d5dbce60d08ccb99d981778d74044d646d4e - PyPI sdist SHA256:
6f3b91b1c0a02bb9a78b5a454c92506aa0fdf197e1d5e114d2e00c6f64306d22
Vulnerability Details
- CWE: CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity; related availability impact maps to CWE-400
- Component:
bleach/linkifier.py,build_email_re(),LinkifyFilter.handle_email_addresses() - Root cause:
handle_email_addresses()callsself.email_re.finditer(text)on attacker-controlled text.EMAIL_REincludes a repeated dot-atom local-part pattern, so non-email strings such as repeateda.segments with no@force repeated long failing scans. - Security boundary violated: user-submitted text processed by a documented safe linkification helper should not allow an attacker to impose superlinear CPU cost through non-email text.
- Direct impact: per-request CPU exhaustion / denial-of-service risk in applications that enable
parse_email=Trueon attacker-controlled text. - Chain impact, if any: one proof run observed an unrelated
/healthrequest delayed during a concurrent attack request, but this was not reliable across reviewer retests. Treat cross-request service degradation as environment-dependent supporting evidence, not the primary impact. - Severity estimate: Medium / availability-only. The feature is opt-in and deployment body limits/timeouts affect practical severity.
Relevant code path:
bleach/__init__.py:85-125: publiclinkify(text, ..., parse_email=False)constructsLinker(..., parse_email=parse_email)and callslinker.linkify(text).bleach/linkifier.py:77-88:EMAIL_REis compiled from the dot-atom email pattern.bleach/linkifier.py:292-301:handle_email_addresses()appliesself.email_re.finditer(text)to each character token.bleach/linkifier.py:620-623: character tokens are routed into email handling only whenparse_emailis true.docs/goals.rst:30-40: Bleach documents user comments, profile bios, and descriptions as target untrusted text use cases.docs/linkify.rst:300-305:parse_email=Trueis the documented option for creatingmailto:links.
Attack Preconditions
- The consuming application enables the documented
parse_email=Trueoption, for examplebleach.linkify(user_text, parse_email=True)orLinker(parse_email=True).linkify(user_text). - The attacker can submit text that reaches that linkification path. Authentication depends on the host application; a public comment form would make this unauthenticated, while account-only text fields require user privileges.
- The application allows roughly 20-30 KB of text to reach Bleach and lacks a strict timeout or input cap before linkification.
- No custom bounded
email_reis supplied.
Reproduction
Minimal API trigger:
import bleach
payload = ("a." * 15000) + "a"
bleach.linkify(payload, parse_email=True)
The saved HTTP proof uses a local harness with POST /preview calling bleach.linkify(request_body, parse_email=True) and a control endpoint using parse_email=False on the same payload. The exploit sends baseline/control/attack requests over HTTP to 127.0.0.1.
Proof Evidence
The proof ran against Bleach 6.3.0 installed from the audited local checkout in an isolated temporary venv. It used Python 3.12.3 on Linux.
Measured HTTP proof results:
- Payload:
("a." * 15000) + "a"(30001bytes) - Normal baseline
/previewmean:0.001425seconds - Same 30 KB payload with
parse_email=False:0.048349seconds - Attack payload with
parse_email=True:8.719818seconds - Slowdown versus the larger baseline/control mean:
180.35x - Requests sent by proof:
20
Evidence files: poc.py poc_results.json exploit_proof.py exploit_results.json
Scope and Limitations
- This report does not claim XSS, authentication bypass, data disclosure, remote code execution, persistent crash, or persistent service outage.
parse_email=Trueis not the default. The affected path is a documented opt-in feature.- The exact first affected version is not established.
- Practical impact depends on host application input limits, worker model, request timeout policy, and whether untrusted users can submit text to an email-linkification path.
- A reviewer reproduced the direct CPU cost but did not reproduce the proof harness’s
/healthdelay. The direct impact claim is therefore limited to per-request CPU exhaustion. - Bleach is marked deprecated in
README.rst, andSECURITY.mdhas stale supported-version text, but the package still has a 2025 PyPI release and published Mozilla security reporting routes.
Which versions are affected by GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x?
2 open source packages ship an affected version, including bleach.
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
bleach PyPI | All versions | None |
bleach PyPI | All versions | None |
How do I fix GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x?
No fix has been published for GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.
Upgrade, then put limits on request size, rate and nesting depth so one client cannot exhaust the service. More about Denial of service.
Is GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x being exploited?
There is no known exploitation of GHSA-g75f-g53v-794x in the wild and no public exploit code.