GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf Paperclip: codex_local inherited ChatGPT/OpenAI-connected Gmail and was able to send real email

Not scored Published

Paperclip's codex_local runtime inherits Gmail access from ChatGPT/OpenAI apps, allowing unauthorized email reading and sending without explicit user consent.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Any signed-in user
Attackable
Over the internet
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
None listed

What is GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf?

GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf is a missing authorization vulnerability in paperclipai, published on 16 Apr 2026. Any signed-in user can exploit it over the network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

Summary

A Paperclip-managed codex_local runtime was able to access and use a Gmail connector that I had connected in the ChatGPT/OpenAI apps UI, even though I had not explicitly connected Gmail inside Paperclip or separately inside Codex.

In my environment this enabled mailbox access and a real outbound email to be sent from my Gmail account. After I manually intervened to stop the workflow, follow-up retraction messages were also sent, confirming repeated outward write/send capability.

This appears to be a trust-boundary failure between Paperclip-managed Codex execution and inherited OpenAI app connectors, amplified by dangerous-by-default runtime settings.

Details

Successful runtime calls include:

  • mcp__codex_apps__gmail_get_profile
  • mcp__codex_apps__gmail_search_emails
  • mcp__codex_apps__gmail_send_email

The connected Gmail profile resolved to my personal account.

Inside the Paperclip-managed codex-home, I also found cached OpenAI curated connector state for Gmail under a path like:

  • codex-home/plugins/cache/openai-curated/gmail/.../.app.json

This strongly suggests that the runtime had access to an already connected OpenAI apps surface rather than a Paperclip-specific Gmail integration that I intentionally configured.

Separately, in the installed Paperclip code, codex_local defaults dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox to true, and the server-side agent creation path applies that default when the flag is omitted. In practice, that makes this boundary failure much more dangerous because a newly created codex_local agent can operate with approvals and sandbox bypassed by default.

The key issue is this: I had connected Gmail only in the ChatGPT/OpenAI apps UI. I had not intentionally connected Gmail inside Paperclip or separately inside Codex. Despite that, the Paperclip-managed codex_local runtime was able to use Gmail read/write actions.

PoC

Environment:

  • self-hosted Paperclip instance using codex_local
  • Gmail connected in the ChatGPT/OpenAI apps UI
  • no explicit Gmail connection configured inside Paperclip for this test
  • codex_local agent created and run with default behavior

Observed reproduction path:

  1. Connect Gmail in the ChatGPT/OpenAI apps UI.
  2. Create or run a Paperclip codex_local agent.
  3. Execute a task that inspects mailbox state or performs outward communication.
  4. Observe successful Gmail connector calls such as:
    • mcp__codex_apps__gmail_get_profile
    • mcp__codex_apps__gmail_search_emails
    • mcp__codex_apps__gmail_send_email
  5. Observe that the connected profile resolves to the ChatGPT/OpenAI-connected Gmail account and that mailbox reads and real sends are possible.

Private evidence available on request:

  • successful get_profile / search / send logs
  • Paperclip-managed codex-home Gmail connector cache path(s)
  • screenshot showing Gmail write-capable actions such as send_email, send_draft, and update_draft exposed in the connected-app UI
  • incident timeline showing that a real outbound email was sent
  • recipient organizations, timestamps, message IDs, and sanitized evidence for both the original outbound email and the subsequent retraction messages

Impact

This was not only theoretical in my environment. It resulted in:

  • mailbox identity disclosure
  • mailbox search / thread access
  • a real outbound email being sent from a personal connected Gmail account to an external third party
  • follow-up retraction messages being sent after manual intervention, confirming repeated outward write/send capability

From an operator/security perspective, connecting Gmail in the ChatGPT/OpenAI apps UI should not automatically make that connector available to a Paperclip-managed local agent runtime, especially not for write/send actions.

One or more of the following:

  • no inherited OpenAI app connectors by default in Paperclip-managed codex_local runs
  • send/write connectors blocked by default
  • explicit Paperclip-side opt-in before outward actions
  • auditable approval and provenance for connector-mediated actions
  • safer defaults, including dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox = false

Which versions are affected by GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf?

2 open source packages ship an affected version, including paperclipai.

PackageAffectedFixed in
paperclipai npmAll versions to 2026.403.0None
paperclipai npmAll versions to 2026.403.0None

How do I fix GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf?

No fix has been published for GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

Upgrade, and check permissions on every request on the server, not only in the interface. More about Missing authorization.

Is GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Is GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free