GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr Race Condition Enabling Link Following and Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU)

Not scored Published

A race condition in the remove_dir_all crate allows attackers to trick privileged processes into deleting arbitrary files via symlink manipulation.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Not needed
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr?

GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr is a vulnerability in remove_dir_all, published on 24 Feb 2023. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

The remove_dir_all crate is a Rust library that offers additional features over the Rust standard library fs::remove_dir_all function.

It was possible to trick a privileged process doing a recursive delete in an attacker controlled directory into deleting privileged files, on all operating systems.

For instance, consider deleting a tree called 'etc' in a parent directory called 'p'. Between calling remove_dir_all("a") and remove_dir_all("a") actually starting its work, the attacker can move 'p' to 'p-prime', and replace 'p' with a symlink to '/'. Then the privileged process deletes 'p/etc' which is actually /etc, and now your system is broken. There are some mitigations for this exact scenario, such as CWD relative file lookup, but they are not guaranteed - any code using absolute paths will not have that protection in place.

The same attack could be performed at any point in the directory tree being deleted: if 'a' contains a child directory called 'etc', attacking the deletion by replacing 'a' with a link is possible.

The new code in this release mitigates the attack within the directory tree being deleted by using file-handle relative operations: to open 'a/etc', the path 'etc' relative to 'a' is opened, where 'a' is represented by a file descriptor (Unix) or handle (Windows). With the exception of the entry points into the directory deletion logic, this is robust against manipulation of the directory hierarchy, and remove_dir_all will only delete files and directories contained in the tree it is deleting.

The entry path however is a challenge - as described above, there are some potential mitigations, but since using them must be done by the calling code, it is hard to be confident about the security properties of the path based interface.

The new extension trait RemoveDir provides an interface where it is much harder to get it wrong.

somedir.remove_dir_contents("name-of-child").

Callers can then make their own security evaluation about how to securely get a directory handle. That is still not particularly obvious, and we're going to follow up with a helper of some sort (probably in the fs_at crate). Once that is available, the path based entry points will get deprecated.

In the interim, processes that might run with elevated privileges should figure out how to securely identify the directory they are going to delete, to avoid the initial race. Pragmatically, other processes should be fine with the path based entry points : this is the same interface std::fs::remove_dir_all offers, and an unprivileged process running in an attacker controlled directory can't do anything that the attacker can't already do.

Which versions are affected by GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr?

3 open source packages ship an affected version, including remove_dir_all.

PackageAffectedFixed in
remove_dir_all crates.ioAll versions0.8.0
remove_dir_all crates.ioAll versions0.8.0
remove_dir_all crates.ioFrom 0.0.0-00.8.0

How do I fix GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr?

Upgrade remove_dir_all to 0.8.0 or later.

Is GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Also known as RUSTSEC-2023-0018.

Is GHSA-mc8h-8q98-g5hr in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free