GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch Unsigned SAML LogoutRequest Acceptance in gosaml2
Attackers can forge unsigned SAML LogoutRequests to terminate user sessions in applications using the gosaml2 library, bypassing signature validation.
- Exploited in the wild
- Not known
- Login needed
- Not needed
- Attackable
- Over the internet
- Victim action needed
- Not needed
- Fix
- Available
What is GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch?
GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch is a vulnerability in github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2, published on 18 Mar 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Official description
Summary
The ValidateEncodedLogoutRequestPOST function in gosaml2 accepts completely unsigned SAML LogoutRequest messages even when SkipSignatureValidation is set to false. When validateElementSignature returns dsig.ErrMissingSignature, the code in decode_logout_request.go:60-62 silently falls through to process the unverified XML element instead of rejecting it. An attacker who can reach the SP's Single Logout endpoint can forge a LogoutRequest for any user, terminating their session without possessing the IdP's signing key.
Affected Version
- Library:
github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 - Version: All versions up to and including the latest commit on
main(as of 2026-03-16) - File:
decode_logout_request.go, lines 58-69
Vulnerable Code
// decode_logout_request.go:57-69
var requestSignatureValidated bool
if !sp.SkipSignatureValidation {
el, err = sp.validateElementSignature(el)
if err == dsig.ErrMissingSignature {
// Unfortunately we just blew away our Response
el = doc.Root() // <-- BUG: falls through with unsigned element
} else if err != nil {
return nil, err
} else if el == nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("missing transformed logout request")
} else {
requestSignatureValidated = true
}
}
When ErrMissingSignature is returned, the code resets el to the raw document root and continues. The requestSignatureValidated variable remains false, but no error is returned. The unsigned LogoutRequest is unmarshalled and passed to ValidateDecodedLogoutRequest, which performs attribute/issuer checks but does not verify that a signature was present.
Attack Details
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Attack vector | Network (HTTP POST to SLO endpoint) |
| Authentication required | None |
| Payload size | ~450 bytes (unsigned XML) |
| User interaction | None |
| Complexity | Low – only requires knowledge of the SP's SLO URL and IdP issuer |
| CVSS estimate | 7.5 (High) – Network/Low/None/None, Availability impact |
Impact
- Arbitrary session termination: An attacker can force-logout any user by forging a
LogoutRequestwith the victim'sNameID. This is a targeted denial-of-service. - Business disruption: Critical users (executives, admins, operators) can be repeatedly logged out, disrupting access to the application during incidents or time-sensitive operations.
- Security control bypass: If session termination triggers downstream effects (e.g., revoking tokens, clearing caches), an attacker can weaponize this to force re-authentication flows and potentially intercept them.
- No cryptographic material needed: The attacker does not need the IdP's private key. The forged request contains zero cryptographic elements.
Suggested Fix
When ErrMissingSignature is returned and SkipSignatureValidation is false, the function should return an error instead of falling through:
// decode_logout_request.go -- fixed version
var requestSignatureValidated bool
if !sp.SkipSignatureValidation {
el, err = sp.validateElementSignature(el)
if err == dsig.ErrMissingSignature {
// FIXED: reject unsigned requests when signature validation is required
return nil, fmt.Errorf("logout request is not signed: %w", dsig.ErrMissingSignature)
} else if err != nil {
return nil, err
} else if el == nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("missing transformed logout request")
} else {
requestSignatureValidated = true
}
}
This ensures that unsigned LogoutRequest messages are rejected when SkipSignatureValidation is false, matching the behavior that operators expect when they configure signature enforcement.
Attached lab f1_unsigned_logout.zip
Which versions are affected by GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch?
3 open source packages ship an affected version, including github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2.
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 Go | All versions | 0.11.0 |
github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 Go | All versions | 0.11.0 |
github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 Go | All versions | 0.11.0 |
How do I fix GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch?
Upgrade github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 to 0.11.0 or later.
Is GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch being exploited?
There is no known exploitation of GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch in the wild and no public exploit code.
Sources
Also known as GO-2026-4764.