GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq ha-mcp: Add-on settings and policy routes are reachable without authentication at the bare root path

Not scored Published

Unauthenticated attackers on the local network can modify Home Assistant MCP add-on settings, toggle features, and manage backups due to missing authentication on root routes.

Exploited in the wild
Not known
Login needed
Not needed
Attackable
Local or same network only
Victim action needed
Not needed
Fix
Available

What is GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq?

GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq is a missing authorization vulnerability in ha-mcp, published on 7 Jul 2026. It can only be exploited from the same machine or local network, with no action from the victim.

Official description

Summary

In add-on mode, the ha-mcp settings UI routes are mounted both under the MCP secret path and at the bare root of the published port (:9583), so Home Assistant ingress can serve the "Open Web UI" button. The root-mounted routes perform no authentication — no secret, no Origin check, no CSRF token — so any client that can reach :9583 without the MCP secret can invoke them.

Affected configurations

Home Assistant add-on installations (host_network: true with port 9583 published), v7.6.0 and earlier. Docker and standalone installs are not affected — there the settings routes are mounted only under the secret path.

Root-mounted routes in affected versions: tool visibility (/api/settings/tools GET/POST), feature flags (/api/settings/features GET/POST), the auto-backup suite (/api/settings/backups… incl. restore/delete, and /api/settings/backup-config), add-on restart (/api/settings/restart), and — when the opt-in Tool Security Policies feature is enabled — the approval-policy API (/api/policy/config GET/PUT, /api/policy/approve, /api/policy/deny, …).

Impact

Without authentication, a caller that reaches :9583 — a peer on the local network, a reverse proxy/tunnel that forwards the bare root path (e.g. a whole-host Cloudflared config), or a CSRF POST from a page open in a LAN browser — can read or change which MCP tools are exposed, toggle feature flags, list/view/restore/delete backups, restart the add-on, and (with Tool Security Policies enabled) read and rewrite the approval policy, disabling the human-approval gate on gated tools.

There is no access to Home Assistant data, entities, or credentials, and no code execution. All effects are confined to the add-on's own configuration and lifecycle and are recoverable. The primary (same-LAN) vector is within the add-on's documented trusted-network model; remote reachability requires the operator to have reverse-proxied the bare port.

Proof of concept

With the add-on running and reachable on :9583, from any host that can reach the port without the secret:

GET  /api/settings/tools                 -> 200   (read tool config, no auth)
POST /api/settings/tools  {"states":{}}  -> 200   (rewrite tool config, no auth / no CSRF token)
POST /api/settings/restart               -> 200   (restart the add-on)

The MCP endpoint itself remains correctly protected by the secret path.

Patch

Fixed in PR homeassistant-ai/ha-mcp#1508 (merged to master): the root-mounted add-on routes are restricted to Home Assistant ingress, which always originates from the Supervisor (172.30.32.2); every other caller receives 403. Direct and remote access continue to use the settings UI under the MCP secret path (…/<secret>/settings), so the "Open Web UI" button, Cloudflared, and the Webhook Proxy add-on are unaffected.

The fix will ship in the next stable add-on release. If you'd rather have it now, it is already on the dev channel (add-on dev build 7.6.0.dev393 or later) — optional; there's no need to switch channels just for this, it is a fairly low risk surface and only exposes the web UI for addon mode only.

Severity

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L = 6.4 (Moderate). Confidentiality impact is None — tool config and backups are not secrets or credentials; integrity and availability impacts are Low — configuration changes and an add-on restart are recoverable.

Credit

Reported by @bharat.

Which versions are affected by GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq?

2 open source packages ship an affected version, including ha-mcp.

PackageAffectedFixed in
ha-mcp PyPIAll versions7.10.0
ha-mcp PyPIAll versions7.10.0

How do I fix GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq?

Upgrade ha-mcp to 7.10.0 or later.

Upgrade, and check permissions on every request on the server, not only in the interface. More about Missing authorization.

Is GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq in the wild and no public exploit code.

Sources

Is GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq in your software?

Upload an SBOM and sbomify checks it against every vulnerability here, every day.

Check your SBOMs for free