{"answers":{"affected":"6 open source packages ship an affected version, including go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 and go.etcd.io/etcd.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"Upgrade go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 to a fixed version for your release line: 3.3.23 or 3.4.10.","what":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64 is a vulnerability in go.etcd.io/etcd, published on 3 Feb 2024. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64 is a vulnerability in go.etcd.io/etcd, published on 3 Feb 2024. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.\nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected all versions; no fix listed\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 3.3.23\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected all versions; fixed in 3.3.23\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected from 3.4.0-rc.0; fixed in 3.4.10\n- go.etcd.io/etcd/v3 (Go): affected from 3.4.0-rc.0; fixed in 3.4.10\n- go.etcd.io/etcd (Go): affected all versions; no fix listed\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64/index.md)","id":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64/index.md","name":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64","record":{"aliases":["GO-2024-2530"],"analysis":{"component_type":"server_software","fix_type":"patch","impacts":["data_read"],"network_reachable":"yes","non_default_config":true,"product_category":"etcd distributed key-value store","requires_auth":"none","summary":"Insufficient logging of failed authentication attempts for certificate-based users may mislead security audits in etcd deployments.","user_interaction":"not_required","vuln_class":"information_disclosure"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":null,"cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":null,"severity":null,"source":null,"vector":null,"version":null},"cwes":[],"description":"### Vulnerability type\nLogging\n\n### Detail\netcd users who have no password can authenticate only through a client certificate. When such users try to authenticate into etcd using the Authenticate endpoint, errors are logged with insufficient information regarding why the authentication failed, and may be misleading when auditing etcd logs.\n\n### References\nFind out more on this vulnerability in the [security audit report](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf)\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Contact the [etcd security committee](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/security-release-process.md#product-security-committee-psc)","ecosystems":["Go"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":null,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":null,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":null,"nuclei":null,"refs":[],"tier":null},"has_fix":true,"headline":"Etcd auth Inaccurate logging of authentication attempts for users with CN-based auth only","id":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"advisory","links":{"ecosystem":"Go","product":null,"products":[],"type":"information_disclosure","year":"2024"},"n_packages":6,"n_references":null,"packages":[{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd","source":"GO-2024-2530"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":[],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","source":"GO-2024-2530"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.3.23"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.3.23"],"introduced":["0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","source":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.4.10"],"introduced":["3.4.0-rc.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":null,"source":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64"},{"ecosystem":"Go","fixed":["3.4.10"],"introduced":["3.4.0-rc.0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","purl":"pkg:golang/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3","source":"GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64"}],"products":null,"published":"2024-02-03","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"GitHub Advisory Database","prefix":"GHSA"},{"class":"attribution","licence":"CC BY 4.0","name":"Go Vulnerability Database","prefix":"GO"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":null,"updated":null,"vendors":null},"summary":"Insufficient logging of failed authentication attempts for certificate-based users may mislead security audits in etcd deployments.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/GHSA-vjg6-93fv-qv64/"}