# OSV-2020-973: Heap-buffer-overflow in pcpp::HeaderField::HeaderField

> A heap-buffer-overflow in the PcapPlusPlus library allows attackers to cause denial of service or potentially execute code via crafted SIP responses.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not needed
- **Attackable:** Over the internet
- **Victim action needed:** Not needed
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 22 Jul 2020

## What is OSV-2020-973?

OSV-2020-973 is a memory corruption vulnerability in pcapplusplus, published on 22 Jul 2020. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.

### Official description

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=22837

```
Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 1
Crash state:
pcpp::HeaderField::HeaderField
pcpp::TextBasedProtocolMessage::parseFields
pcpp::SipResponseLayer::SipResponseLayer
```

## Which versions are affected by OSV-2020-973?

1 open source package ship an affected version, including pcapplusplus.


| Package | Ecosystem | Affected | Fixed in |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `pcapplusplus` | OSS-Fuzz | All versions | None |

## How do I fix OSV-2020-973?

No fix has been published for OSV-2020-973 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is OSV-2020-973 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of OSV-2020-973 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for OSV-2020-973 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: OSV-2020-973 is a memory corruption vulnerability in pcapplusplus, published on 22 Jul 2020. An attacker can exploit it over the internet without logging in, with no action from the victim.
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of OSV-2020-973 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected packages and fixed versions:
- pcapplusplus (OSS-Fuzz): affected all versions; no fix listed

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/OSV-2020-973/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/OSV-2020-973/index.md)
```

## Sources

- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/OSV-2020-973

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/OSV-2020-973/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.
