# RUSTSEC-2024-0380: Replaced by `pqcrypto-mldsa`

> The deprecated crate is replaced by pqcrypto-mldsa for FIPS204 compatibility, requiring developers to migrate to the new library.

- **Severity:** Not scored
- **Exploited in the wild:** Not known
- **Login needed:** Not stated
- **Attackable:** Not stated
- **Victim action needed:** Not stated
- **Fix available:** No
- **Published:** 24 Oct 2024

## What is RUSTSEC-2024-0380?

RUSTSEC-2024-0380 is a vulnerability in pqcrypto-dilithium, published on 24 Oct 2024. 

### Official description

This crate has been replaced by `pqcrypto-mldsa`, which provides a
FIPS204-compatible implementation of ML-DSA.

## Which versions are affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0380?

1 open source package ship an affected version, including pqcrypto-dilithium.


| Package | Ecosystem | Affected | Fixed in |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `pqcrypto-dilithium` | crates.io | From 0.0.0-0 | None |

## How do I fix RUSTSEC-2024-0380?

No fix has been published for RUSTSEC-2024-0380 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.

## Is RUSTSEC-2024-0380 being exploited?

There is no known exploitation of RUSTSEC-2024-0380 in the wild and no public exploit code.

## Fix prompt for AI coding agents

```text
Check this codebase for RUSTSEC-2024-0380 and fix it if it is affected.

What it is: RUSTSEC-2024-0380 is a vulnerability in pqcrypto-dilithium, published on 24 Oct 2024. 
Exploitation: There is no known exploitation of RUSTSEC-2024-0380 in the wild and no public exploit code.

Affected packages and fixed versions:
- pqcrypto-dilithium (crates.io): affected from 0.0.0-0; no fix listed

Task:
1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.
2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.
3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.
4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.
5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.

Reference: https://insights.sbomify.com/RUSTSEC-2024-0380/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/RUSTSEC-2024-0380/index.md)
```

## Sources

- OSV: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/RUSTSEC-2024-0380

---
From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/RUSTSEC-2024-0380/
Summaries are generated and may contain mistakes; the official description above is the record.