{"answers":{"affected":"1 open source package ship an affected version, including surf.","exploited":"There is no known exploitation of RUSTSEC-2026-0169 in the wild and no public exploit code.","fix":"No fix has been published for RUSTSEC-2026-0169 yet. Limit exposure of the affected software until one is available.","what":"RUSTSEC-2026-0169 is a vulnerability in surf, published on 4 Jun 2026."},"fix_prompt":"Check this codebase for RUSTSEC-2026-0169 and fix it if it is affected.\n\nWhat it is: RUSTSEC-2026-0169 is a vulnerability in surf, published on 4 Jun 2026. \nExploitation: There is no known exploitation of RUSTSEC-2026-0169 in the wild and no public exploit code.\n\nAffected packages and fixed versions:\n- surf (crates.io): affected from 0.0.0-0; no fix listed\n\nTask:\n1. Search the dependency manifests and lockfiles (for example package.json, package-lock.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, uv.lock, pom.xml, build.gradle, go.mod, Cargo.lock, Gemfile.lock) and any Dockerfiles for the affected packages, including transitive dependencies.\n2. If an affected version is in use, upgrade it to the fixed version for its release line with the project's package manager, so the lockfile is regenerated. Prefer the smallest upgrade that fixes it.\n3. If there is no fix, or the upgrade would break the build, do not guess: explain the risk and the safest workaround instead.\n4. Run the tests and summarise what changed and why.\n5. If nothing in the project is affected, say so and change nothing.\n\nReference: https://insights.sbomify.com/RUSTSEC-2026-0169/ (Markdown: https://insights.sbomify.com/RUSTSEC-2026-0169/index.md)","id":"RUSTSEC-2026-0169","markdown":"https://insights.sbomify.com/RUSTSEC-2026-0169/index.md","name":"RUSTSEC-2026-0169","record":{"aliases":[],"analysis":{"component_type":"library","fix_type":"upgrade","impacts":["other"],"network_reachable":"unknown","non_default_config":false,"product_category":"Rust HTTP client library","requires_auth":"unknown","summary":"The surf crate is unmaintained, posing supply chain risks; developers should migrate to maintained alternatives like reqwest or ureq.","user_interaction":"unknown","vuln_class":"supply_chain"},"analysis_generated_by":"qwen3.8-flash-next","assigner":null,"cpe":[],"cvss":{"score":null,"severity":null,"source":null,"vector":null,"version":null},"cwes":[],"description":"The surf crate is unmaintained, and all versions are affected.\n\nFor alternatives, consider using [reqwest](https://crates.io/crates/reqwest)\nor [ureq](https://crates.io/crates/ureq).\n\nSee [this issue](https://github.com/http-rs/surf/issues/352) for more context.","ecosystems":["crates.io"],"exploits":{"exploitdb":null,"first_seen":null,"github_poc":null,"max_poc_stars":null,"metasploit":null,"nuclei":null,"refs":[],"tier":null},"has_fix":false,"headline":"surf is unmaintained","id":"RUSTSEC-2026-0169","indexable":true,"kev":null,"kind":"advisory","links":{"ecosystem":"crates.io","product":null,"products":[],"type":"supply_chain","year":"2026"},"n_packages":1,"n_references":null,"packages":[{"ecosystem":"crates.io","fixed":[],"introduced":["0.0.0-0"],"last_affected":[],"package":"surf","purl":"pkg:cargo/surf","source":"RUSTSEC-2026-0169"}],"products":null,"published":"2026-06-04","related":[],"sources":[{"class":"open","licence":"CC0 1.0","name":"RustSec","prefix":"RUSTSEC"}],"ssvc":{"automatable":null,"exploitation":null,"technical_impact":null},"state":null,"updated":null,"vendors":null},"summary":"The surf crate is unmaintained, posing supply chain risks; developers should migrate to maintained alternatives like reqwest or ureq.","url":"https://insights.sbomify.com/RUSTSEC-2026-0169/"}