# Vulnerabilities published in 1999 - [CVE-1999-1091](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1091/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1090](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1090/): Misconfiguration in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1089](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1089/): Memory corruption in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1088](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1088/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1087](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1087/): Security feature bypass in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1086](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1086/): Auth bypass in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1085](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1085/): Other in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1084](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1084/): Privilege escalation in n/a (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1083](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1083/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1082](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1082/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1081](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1081/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1080](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1080/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1079](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1079/): Vulnerability in ptrace in AIX 4.3 allows local users to gain privileges by attaching to a setgid program. (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1078](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1078/): Weak cryptography in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1077](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1077/): Auth bypass in n/a (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1076](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1076/): Auth bypass in n/a (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1075](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1075/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1074](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1074/): Auth bypass in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1073](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1073/): Weak cryptography in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1072](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1072/): Information disclosure in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1071](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1071/): Misconfiguration in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1070](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1070/): Memory corruption in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1069](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1069/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1068](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1068/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1067](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1067/): Information disclosure in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1066](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1066/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1065](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1065/): Memory corruption in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1064](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1064/): Memory corruption in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1063](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1063/): Command injection in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1062](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1062/): Security feature bypass in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1061](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1061/): Missing authorization in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1060](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1060/): Memory corruption in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1059](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1059/): Vulnerability in rexec daemon (rexecd) in AT&T TCP/IP 4.0 for various SVR4 systems allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands. (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1058](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1058/): Memory corruption in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1057](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1057/): Privilege escalation in n/a (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1055](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1055/): Code injection in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1054](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1054/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1053](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1053/): Code injection in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1052](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1052/): Information disclosure in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1051](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1051/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1050](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1050/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1049](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1049/): Weak cryptography in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1048](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1048/): Memory corruption in n/a (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1047](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1047/): Security feature bypass in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1046](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1046/): Memory corruption in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1045](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1045/): Denial of service in n/a (high 7.8) - [CVE-1999-1044](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1044/): Privilege escalation in n/a (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1043](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1043/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1042](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1042/): Information disclosure in n/a (low 1.2) - [CVE-1999-1041](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1041/): Memory corruption in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1040](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1040/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1039](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1039/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1038](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1038/): Path traversal in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1037](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1037/): Path traversal in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1036](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1036/): Path traversal in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1035](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1035/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1034](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1034/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1033](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1033/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1032](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1032/): Privilege escalation in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1031](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1031/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1030](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1030/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1029](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1029/): Information disclosure in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1028](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1028/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1027](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1027/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1026](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1026/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1025](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1025/): CDE screen lock program (screenlock) on Solaris 2.6 does not properly lock an unprivileged user's console session when the host is an NIS+ c (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1024](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1024/): Denial of service in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1023](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1023/): useradd in Solaris 7.0 does not properly interpret certain date formats as specified in the "-e" (expiration date) argument, which could all (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1022](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1022/): Privilege escalation in n/a (medium 6.2) - [CVE-1999-1021](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1021/): NFS on SunOS 4.1 through 4.1.2 ignores the high order 16 bits in a 32 bit UID, which allows a local user to gain root access if the lower 16 (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1020](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1020/): Information disclosure in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1019](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1019/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1018](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1018/): Security feature bypass in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1017](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1017/): Code injection in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-1016](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1016/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1015](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1015/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1014](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1014/): Memory corruption in n/a (medium 4.6) - [CVE-1999-1013](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1013/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1012](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1012/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1011](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1011/): Command injection in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-1010](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1010/): Security feature bypass in n/a (low 2.1) - [CVE-1999-1009](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1009/): Missing authorization in n/a (low 2.6) - [CVE-1999-1008](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1008/): Privilege escalation in n/a (high 7.2) - [CVE-1999-1007](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1007/): Memory corruption in n/a (high 7.6) - [CVE-1999-1006](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1006/): Information disclosure in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1005](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1005/): Path traversal in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1004](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1004/): Memory corruption in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1003](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1003/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1002](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1002/): Weak cryptography in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-1001](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1001/): Auth bypass in n/a (low 2.6) - [CVE-1999-1000](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-1000/): Information disclosure in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-0999](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0999/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 4.3) - [CVE-1999-0998](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0998/): Missing authorization in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-0997](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0997/): Command injection in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-0996](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0996/): Memory corruption in n/a (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-0995](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0995/): Denial of service in n/a (high 7.8) - [CVE-1999-0994](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0994/): Weak cryptography in n/a (medium 5.0) - [CVE-1999-0993](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0993/): Modifications to ACLs (Access Control Lists) in Microsoft Exchange 5.5 do not take effect until the directory store cache is refreshed. (high 7.5) - [CVE-1999-0992](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0992/): Auth bypass in n/a (critical 10.0) - [CVE-1999-0991](https://insights.sbomify.com/CVE-1999-0991/): Denial of service in n/a (medium 5.0) --- From sbomify Insights: https://insights.sbomify.com/years/1999/page/6/